Cílem příspěvku je pojednat o historické slavistice jako o jedné z části multioborově pojaté slavistiky. Úkolem je přiblížit její tematické i metodologické proměny prostřednictvím statí a článků, které byly publikovány ve sto ročnících periodika Slovanský přehled, tedy mezi léty 1898 a 2014. Práce má analytický charakter s aspirací vyzdvihnout současné trendy v oblasti historické slavistiky a naznačit některé perspektivy. Výchozím bodem je úvodní určení zakladatele Slovanského přehledu sorabisty Adolfa Černého, aby byl Slovanský přehled časopisem, který by naplňoval cíl "sledování rozvoje slovanských literatur, slovanské vědy, umění a vůbec snah kulturních". Historická slavistika je ve studii sledována především v dimenzi dějin slovanské vzájemnosti, proměn idejí slovanství a vztahů mezi slovanskými národy. Dějiny slavistiky jsou zmíněny jen okrajově, neboť podle našeho názoru ve své podstatě tvoří samostatný slavistický obor. and The paper aims to approach historical Slavonic studies as one part of multidisciplinarily conceived Slavonic studies. The aim is to shed light on its thematic and methodological transformations through essays and articles published in 100 issues of the Slavonic Review journal between 1898 and 2014. The work is of analytical nature with the aspiration to highlight the current trends in the area of historical Slavonic studies and suggest some perspectives. The starting point is the initial determination of the founder of Slavonic Review, Sorbian scholar Adolf Černý, to make Slavonic Review a journal meeting the aim of "monitoring the development of Slavonic literatures, Slavonic science, art and generally cultural efforts". Historical Slavonic studies are monitored in the study mainly in the dimension of history of Slavic reciprocity, changes in the ideas of Slavonic patriotism, and relations between Slavonic nations. The history of Slavonic studies are mentioned only marginally as they constitute, in our view, an independent field of Slavonic studies.
This study focuses on the issue of Russian conservatism at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. The author works in a multifaceted way with Alan Sked's work on British conservatism in the early 19th century and points out that the conclusions which Sked outlined for the British setting can also to some extent be applied elsewhere, specifically to the setting of the Russian Empire.
The aim of the article is to discuss about the roots of modern Russian national identity as an expression of the activity of the Russian state and the Russian orthodox church. Goes to show, what role did the crisis moments of the Russian state in an attempt to rally the Russian people around traditional vision of the Russian sobornost', therefore, the unity of the state, the orthodox faith and the Russian people. The work places emphasis on determining the fundamental identification of the manifestations, which state officials tried to save Russia in the time of peril Napoleon and then build an official form of identity of the company, with the support of the orthodox faith, pointing rather to a political religion than the actual doctrinal profile. The culmination of this process was the so-called triad of the minister of education count Sergej Semjonovič Uvarov. Work is of an analytical character with the characters of the case study crossing the boundaries of political history towards a history of broad-based culture and the history of ideas.