The contribution deals with such artistic texts in Slovak literature which trough their themes are cinfronting experience of a literary character with a difficult verifiable social situation and his/her intimate memory. The author of the contribution has chosen artistic texts of the authors representing different generations; it means that the theme and the problem differ on the background of political, historical and social changes and experience. Thus, literature in the kaleidoscope records and interprets a dramatic relationship of man to politics and historical changes.
Literárnovedná slavistika má vo svojich dejinách vyprofilované národné školy, čo sa spája s tým, že si vypracovala aj svoj jazyk. Slavistické pracovisko na Masarykovej univerzite patrí svojou štruktúrou, organizáciou výskumu a metodológiou medzi najvýraznejšie v stredoeurópskom výskume. V poslednom období v odbornej verejnosti predstavilo dva monografické výstupy. Ivo Pospíšil je autor práce Srovnávací studie a Ivan Dorovský je autor práce Slovanské literatury a dnešek. Pospíšilov záber sa dotýka stredoeurópskeho literárneho slavistického sveta a Dorovský sa zaujíma o južnoeurópsky slavistický priestor. Pospíšil sa sústreďuje na metodologické otázky komparatistiky, kým Dorovského výskum má charakter panoramatického dejinného výkladu. Obidve práce sú aktuálne a majú hodnotné podnety na riešenie krízy v slavistikom výskume. and During the course of history, literary-scientific Slavic studies had created national schools and this was connected also with the development of their own language. The Slavic studies place of work at Masaryk University belongs to the most significant ones in Central European research regarding its structure, research organization and methodology. Recently, it has introduced two monographic works to a scientific public. Ivo Pospíšil is the author of the work Srovnávací studie and Ivan Dorovský is the author of the work Slovanské literatury a dnešek. Pospíšil provides a view on Central European literary Slavic world and Dorovský is interested in Southern European Slavic area. Pospíšil is concentrated on the issues of a comparative methodology, while Dorovský's research has a character of a panoramic historical interpretation. Both works are topical and give valuable stimuli to the solution of a crisis in Slavic studies research.
Pozornosť autorky textu sa sústredila na rodovo exponovanú prózu M. Durasovej. Ambíciou nie je sonda do feministickej prózy. Skutočnosť, že v próze dominuje práca s literárnym časom a literárnym priestorom zaujala dominantné postavenie pri analýze a interpretovaní výrazu a možných významov v koncepte stratégie autorky a jej odraz v stratégii textu. Extrémne rozpätie literárneho času (vtedy - teraz), fyzického času rozprávačky a postavy (mladosť - staroba), odlišnosť literárneho priestoru (Ázia - Európa) vytvorili takú naračnú príležitosť pre ženskú postavu, v ktorej zaujme jej tenzijný vzťah voči všetkému, čo ju identifikuje ako konkrétny subjekt konzervatívnom spoločenskom prostredí. Senzuálne rozvíjaná erotická línia, zmyslové reflektovanie subjektu svojho jestvovania má svoje epicentrum v emocionálnej, sociálnej a rodinnej träume. Práve problému uchovania a navrstvovania traumy v pamäti sa premietol do kompozične precízne organizovanej deštrukcie tajomstva subjektu. and The author's attention is focused on the phenomenon of the strongly exposed motif of a family line in the prose work of M. Duras. The ambition of the study is not to analyse feminist prose, rather the fact that the dominant feature of the prose's poetics is handling with literary time and space which occupied a dominant position in the analysis and interpretation of literary expression and its potential meanings in the concept of the prose writer's strategy and its reflection in the strategy of the text itself. The extreme range of literary time (once - now), the physical time of the female narrator and the literary character (youth - old age), the otherness of literary space (Asia - Europe) formed a specific narrative chance for a female character in which she adopted the narrative position as a permanent tension in relation to all that identified her as a concrete subject in the conservative social environment. The sensually developed erotic plot, the sensual reflection of the subject of its existence has its focus in the emotional, social, and family trauma. The very problem of the protection and formation of the layers of the trauma in memory were reflected in the precisely organised composition of destruction of the secret of the subject's enigma.