The article is devoted to František Čáda. The author describes Čáda´s life dedicated to archivistic, teaching, research and editorial work. She describes ow the changes of the political regime in 1948 affected the life of this outstanding Czech legal historian, a diligent editor and and excellent teacher who was forced to leave the university. Only thanks to their commitment and assistance prof. Vojtíšek later found application in manuscirpts research. Diligent and accurate work brought him recognition not only among law historians even among codicologists. and Medailonek
There are many uncertainties about the production and dissemination of vocal polyphony manuscripts from Prague illuminators’ and scribes’ ateliers compared with the dissemination of monophonic vocal manuscripts. The only known “workshop” producing manuscripts with primarily polyphonic music is the one led by Master Jan Kantor Starý († 1582) in Prague’s New Town. However, the number of surviving manuscripts suggests that more “workshops” might have existed in Prague at the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries. The goal of this study is to ascertain if there were any other ateliers in Prague producing vocal polyphony manuscripts during the analysed period. The findings are based on recent palaeographic and codicological analyses of the selected group of polyphonic sources written by identical scribal hands: Kutná Hora Codex from 1593 (Czech Museum of Music, Prague), Trubka’s Gradual from 1604 (Prague City Archives, Prague), the Partbook of the St. Barbara Literary Brotherhood in Přeštice from 1619 (National Library of the Czech Republic, Prague) and a bifolio from an unknown partbook in the Gradual of the St. Castulus Church from 1580 (Library of the Archbishop’s Chateau, Kroměříž). The comparison of the analysed scribal hands indicates the existence of an atelier that was probably from the milieu of the royal court. Systematic inquiries into the professional production of polyphonic manuscripts should thus continue because that is the only way to better and fully understand the musical culture of the Czech lands during the Renaissance., Natálie Krátká., Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy, and Jan Pulkrábek [překladatel]
Th e author of this article speaks on the topic canon procedural law in Prague at the turn of 14th and 15th century. Th ere is tractate Processus iudiciarius secundum stilum Pragensem written by general vicar of Prague archbishop Nicolaus Puchnik in the 2nd half of the 80´s of 14th century. Th e main purpose of the article is paleographical, codicological and contentual analysis of all preserved manuscripts (13 pieces) of Processus and make fi liation diagram. High concern is focused on diff erences in personal and geographical names in manuscripts which are very important for providing origin and fi liation analysis. All these names and dates are highlited because the author considers them to be very important for provenance fi xing. Th ere are presented two fi liation diagrams. Th e article is attached by chart with chronological order of all manuscripts.
The author of this article speaks on the topic canon procedural law in Prague at the turn of 14th and 15th century. Th ere is tractate Processus iudiciarius secundum stilum Pragensem written by general vicar of Prague archbishop Nicolaus Puchnik in the 2nd half of the 80´s of 14th century. Th e main purpose of the article is paleographical, codicological and contentual analysis of all preserved manuscripts (13 pieces) of Processus and make fi liation diagram. High concern is focused on diff erences in personal and geographical names in manuscripts which are very important for providing origin and fi liation analysis. All these names and dates are highlited because the author considers them to be very important for provenance fi xing. Th ere are presented two fi liation diagrams. Th e article is attached by chart with chronological order of all manuscripts.
The author of this article speaks on the topic canon procedural law in Prague at the turn of 14th and 15th century. Th ere is tractate Processus iudiciarius secundum stilum Pragensem written by general vicar of Prague archbishop Nicolaus Puchnik in the 2nd half of the 80´s of 14th century. Th e main purpose of the article is paleographical, codicological and contentual analysis of all preserved manuscripts (13 pieces) of Processus and make fi liation diagram. High concern is focused on differences in personal and geographical names in manuscripts which are very important for providing origin and fi liation analysis. All these names and dates are highlited because the author considers them to be very important for provenance fixing. Th ere are presented two fi liation diagrams. Th e article is attached by chart with chronological order of all manuscripts.
This study focuses on the manuscripts of the library of the Piarist College in Mikulov which is kept at the Moravian Provincial Library in Brno as a closed holding. The inventory is based on an old manuscript inventory compiled by Vladislav Dokoupil (1918–1992) which, however, has been adapted, completed, and extended substantially by a historical commentary. In the commentary the author tries to determine the origin of the manuscript collection by analysing preserved manuscripts and other archival material of Piarist provenance.
This study focuses on the manuscripts of the library of the Piarist College in Mikulov which is kept at the Moravian Provincial Library in Brno as a closed holding. The inventory is based on an old manuscript inventory compiled by Vladislav Dokoupil (1918–1992) which, however, has been adapted, completed, and extended substantially by a historical commentary. In the commentary the author tries to determine the origin of the manuscript collection by analysing preserved manuscripts and other archival material of Piarist provenance.
This study focuses on the manuscripts of the library of the Piarist College in Mikulov which is kept at the Moravian Provincial Library in Brno as a closed holding. The inventory is based on an old manuscript inventory compiled by Vladislav Dokoupil (1918–1992) which, however, has been adapted, completed, and extended substantially by a historical commentary. In the commentary the author tries to determine the origin of the manuscript collection by analysing preserved manuscripts and other archival material of Piarist provenance.