The article is concentrated on a group of three manuscripts, connected with a person of the copist designated "glossator B": manuscript of the Library of benedictine abbey Rajhrad R 388 and two manuscripts of National Library of Czech Republik IX.C.6 and IV.D.7. These manuscripts are identified as a product of a scriptorium in Břevnov in the era of the abbot Meinhardus (1035/1044–1089). and Der Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit einer Gruppe von Handschriften, und zwar mit der Handschrift der Klosterbibliothek in Rajhrad/Raygern (R 388: Martyrologium Rajhradense) und mit den zwei Handschriften der Nationalbibliothek in Prag (IX.C.6: Boethii Quadrivium und IV.D.7: Gregorii Magni Homiliae). Diese Handschriften bindet eine gemeinsame Schreiberhand, die als "Glossator B" bezeichnet wurde. Die analysierte Handschriftengruppe wurde als Erzeugnis vom Skriptorium der Benediktinerabtei Břevnov in der Zeit des Abtes Meinhardus von Niederaltaich (1035/1044–1089) identifiziert. Für den "Glossator B" sind die Musikeinträge sehr typisch, seine Arbeit ist oft von Neumen begleitet.
This article deals with the issue of the Lithuanian conversion to Christianity in the 14th century by focusing on the art of politics of the Lithuanian rulers Gediminas (1316–1341), Algirdas (1345–1377) and Kęstutis (1381–1382) with regard to their Christian neighbours. The topic of intentional deception has been contextualised and given special attention in an attempt to highlight that the accession to Christendom was not a self-evident priority for Lithuanian rulers as long as they were beholden to a pagan-warrior lifestyle and were content with the inherited political situation vis-à-vis their Christian and Tatar neighbours.
One of the objectives of the Czech-Liechtenstein Commission of Historians was to try to chart the contemporary state of research into several historical themes which had been suggested as a result of the Czech-Liechtenstein declaration of 2009. This concerns the history of the Principality of Liechtenstein with a particular focus on Czech-Liechtenstein relationships, as well as on the history of the Princely House of Liechtenstein, again in relation to its activities on the territory of the Czech lands as well as in Central Europe. This overview of the literature shows that the history of the Liechtenstein family and its standing in Central European and European history has been a long-term presence in European historiography. The history of the Liechtenstein family has been studied within the context of aristocratic history/the history of social elites, the history of states, cultural and art history, as well as regional and local historiography. Within Czech historiography, the Liechtenstein family is typically present as part of the history of the Czech state and the history of Czech society, particularly in connection with the history of the medieval Czech kingdom, the history of the Battle of White Mountain, as well as relating to research into the foundation of the Czechoslovak Republic and the history of memory and identity. Therefore, the history of the Liechtenstein family differs substantially from the traditional histories of the nobility and individual aristocratic families. In terms of the historiography of Liechtenstein itself, there is a relatively close connection between the history of the Liechtenstein family and the Liechtenstein state.
In the Middle Ages and early modern period, a specific accounting system was used in the Czech lands, known as so-called administrative accounting. The accounting categories and principles of this system were not the same as those used by single-entry and double-entry bookkeeping. The aim of the article is to show with selected accounting terms and categories their semantic variability and thereby start a discussion on accounting terminology that has been thus far absent in the Czech environment.