This text was produced as a material for Arbeitskreis Theorie und Methodologie in der Religionswissenschaft (AKTUM) within Deutsche Vereinigung für Religionswissenschaft (DVRW). The author reflects contemporary debate about scientific foundations of the study of religions. In the first part he compares methods of historical and social sciences and identifies those fields of research in which these methods are most commonly applied. Both methods, which are hardly ever mastered with the same level of competence by one single scientist, tend to explore certain topics. Whereas historical methods use mainly textual sources to answer questions about the past, methods of social sciences provide researcher with tools which enable him/her to intentionally create data about contemporary situation. Specific methods of these two approaches lead, according to the author, to certain one-sidedness – historical study is limited by textual sources, which are most often concerned with mainstream religious traditions, whereas contemporary sociological researches often deal with small, even marginal religious groups. As a result of this situation, issues connected with contemporary mainstream religious traditions remain almost abandoned. ...
The article discusses Donald Wiebe and Luther Martin's paper "Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion". The central thesis of the two authors is that Religious Studies are not and probably can never be a "scientific" discipline. It is argued that the reasons given by the two authors to support their thesis are unconvincing and contradictory. Their suggestion that the study of religion should subscribe to an understanding of science that abandons the concept of agency and reduces human behaviour to "natural" causes is criticised on theoretical and methodological grounds. In fact, it is not possible to completely forsake hermeneutics and to study religion using the methods of the natural sciences because these methods do not allow us to identify religious behaviour. Therefore, the Study of Religion, of course, cannot be a discipline of the natural sciences. However, as a social science, the Study of Religion is no less possible than the social scientific study of any other subject.