Blood films were examined from 154 wild and captive tortoises from four provinces of South Africa, including Gauteng, Kwazulu-Natal, North West and Western Cape. The five species of chelonians studied were Chersina angulata (Schweigger), Kinixys belliana belliana (Gray), K. lobatsiana Power, K. natalensis Hewitt, and Stigmochelys pardalis (Bell). Two species of haemogregarines, previously reported from Mozambique, were identified in blood films, namely Haemogregarina fitzsimonsi Dias, 1953 and Haemogregarina parvula Dias, 1953. Additional stages of development (trophozoites and probable meronts, merozoites and immature gamonts) in blood preparations from South Africa warranted the redescription of H. fitzsimonsi. A variety of hosts and broad host distribution range were observed for this haemogregarine, with all five species of tortoises parasitized, wild and captive, from all four provinces, in all seasons. In contrast, only two individuals of K. b. belliana and one S. pardalis, all three captive in Kwazulu-Natal, contained H. parvula with encapsulated stages resembling those of Hemolivia mauritanica (Sergent et Sergent, 1904). For H. fitzsimonsi, parasite prevalences, but not parasitaemias, were significantly higher in captive than wild S. pardalis; captive female S. pardalis also showed a significantly greater prevalence of infection than males, but younger, lighter hosts were not significantly more heavily parasitized than older, heavier individuals. The ticks, Amblyomma marmoreum Koch, 1844 and A. sylvaticum (De Geer, 1778), found attached to some tortoises, may prove to be definitive hosts for the two species of haemogregarines observed.
A dominating set in a graph $G$ is a connected dominating set of $G$ if it induces a connected subgraph of $G$. The connected domatic number of $G$ is the maximum number of pairwise disjoint, connected dominating sets in $V(G)$. We establish a sharp lower bound on the number of edges in a connected graph with a given order and given connected domatic number. We also show that a planar graph has connected domatic number at most 4 and give a characterization of planar graphs having connected domatic number 3.
After G. N. Lewis (1875-1946) proposed the term “photon” in 1926, many physicists adopted it as a more apt name for Einstein’s light quantum. However, Lewis’ photon was a concept of a very different kind, something few physicists knew or cared about. In fact, it turns out that the term “photon” was not novel, as the same term was proposed or used earlier, apparently independently, by at least four other scientists. Three of the four early proposals were related to physiology or visual perception, and only one to quantum physics. Priority belongs to the American physicist and psychologist L. T. Troland (1889-1932), who coined the word in 1916, and five years later it was independently introduced by the Irish physicist J. Joly (1857-1933). Then in 1925 a French physiologist, René Wurmser (1890-1993), wrote about the photon, and in July 1926 his compatriot, the physicist F. Wolfers (ca. 1890-1971), did the same in the context of optical physics. None of the four pre-Lewis versions of “photon” were well known and they were soon forgotten., Kdy se objevil termín "foton" a v jakém kontextu? O tom pojednává tento článek významného dánského historika fyziky H. S. Kragha. Obecně se soudí, že za "foton" vděčíme slavnému americkému chemikovi G. N. Lewisovi, který tento termín stvořil roku 1926. Je to pravda, ale Kragh ukazuje jednak, že to bylo v jiném kontextu, než jak chápeme foton dnes, jednak, že několik jiných badatelů navrhlo a použilo termín foton již před Lewisem - na ně se však zapomnělo. Nakonec tedy můžeme konstatovat, že "foton" se zrodil několikrát v období deseti let zhruba před sto lety. (jv), Helge S. Kragh., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy