The ultrastructure and dimensions of chloroplasts in leaf mesophyll cells were quantitatively examined in three parental inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.) and their four hybrids subjected to two types of four-week low-temperature (LT) treatment: the abrupt onset of chilling temperatures ("severe chilling", SC) and the gradual, more moderate one ("moderate chilling", MC). The relationship between the response of individual genotypes to one or the other type of chilling was analyzed as well as the possibility to predict the behaviour of chloroplasts in hybrids from that of their parents. Although selected parameters of chloroplast ultrastructure (e.g. volume densities of granal and intergranal thylakoids, plastoglobuli, and peripheral reticulum) and dimensions changed due to the exposure of maize plants to LT, no general pattern of such changes was found for this species due to the observed intraspecific variability. The response of some genotype to SC could not be predicted from its behaviour under MC (and vice versa) and no clear rules could be applied for the inheritance of chloroplast response to chilling in the general sense. Thus, great caution should be always taken when interpreting the results of studies aimed at the dissection of chloroplast ultrastructure as affected by LT, particularly in case such studies are made with one genotype or under one type of chilling only. and D. Holá ... [et al.].
In this paper I wish to discuss so-called principles of inheritance and the familiar claim that it leads to deontic paradoxes. By combining two such paradoxes it will be shown that inheritance amounts to a principle of explosion: supposing that in the actual world there is at least one thing that one ought to do, almost anything is something one ought to do. I will then attempt to qualify the principle of inheritance so as to avoid this and other paradoxical results., V této práci chci diskutovat o tzv. Principech dědictví a známém tvrzení, že vede k deontickým paradoxům. Spojením dvou takových paradoxů se ukáže, že dědictví se rovná principu exploze: za předpokladu, že ve skutečném světě existuje alespoň jedna věc, kterou by člověk měl udělat, téměř cokoliv by mělo být. Pak se pokusím o to, aby se princip dědičnosti kvalifikoval tak, aby se tomuto a dalším paradoxním výsledkům vyhnul., and David Botting
Intraspecific variation in genome size makes it possible to study ongoing processes of genome size evolution. Although there are over 200 papers on intraspecific variation in genome size, there is still limited understanding of this phenomenon, especially as many of these papers are based on weak methodology and therefore report biased or false evidence of the extent of intraspecific variation. In this paper the recent progress in understanding the spatio-temporal dynamics of intraspecific variation in genome size caused by the gradual accumulation of mutations is reviewed. The results of the case studies on Microseris douglasii, Zea mays, Silene latifolia, Hordeum spontaneum and Lolium hybrids, and in particular that on Festuca pallens, are discussed. The variation in genome size that occurs within species is caused mainly by differences in the content of repetitive DNA, in particular it is a consequence of the dynamics of transposable elements. Variation may be induced and maintained polytopically.We assume that it is probably more frequent in groups of young radiating species. Even in the initial stages, the variation in genome size generated within a population seems to be restricted by selection, which is also important in stabilizing genome size within species. The long-term persistence of the variation within a population and its further accumulation may be enhanced by gametes with different genome sizes, produced by the segregation of unequally sized homeologous chromosomes. Over large geographical scales and across contrasting environmental gradients, the distribution of genome sizes within species may be influenced by the nucleotype effect, with smaller genomes being more successful at higher latitudes and altitudes and under stressful conditions. However, the small differences in genome size within species seem generally to be of minor importance relative to other components of plant fitness that may be selectively favourable under particular environmental or habitat conditions. The processes generating variation in genome size may be associated with phenotypic variation. While the shift in the genome size of a population through selection enables adaptive evolution of genome size in a newly arising species, the spatio-temporal variation in genome size within an ancestral species allows for a rapid multiple genome size divergence of related species through random drift in genome size (founder effect, bottleneck effect) during range fragmentation, hybridization and/or polyploidization.