Článek se zabývá problematickou politické korektnosti ve vztahu k feministické fi losofi i vědy. Zaměřuje pozornost na užší pojem politické korektnosti – hodnotově motivovanou nekorektní práci s fakty. Konstatuje, že navzdory explicitnímu soustředění feministických autorek a autorů na význam hodnot v projektu vědy nelze chápat feministickou fi losofi i vědy jako politicky korektní nebo jako vybízení k politicky korektní vědě. Naopak se politicky korektní argumentace v tomto užším smyslu mohou dopou- štět i práce vystupující proti feministické či politicky korektní agendě ve vědě., The paper deals with the question of political correctness with respect to feminist philosophy of science. It focuses on a narrower notion of political correctness – treating facts incorrectly due to value motives. It finds that despite the feminist authors’ explicit focus on the importance of values in the scientifi centerprise, feminist philosophy of science cannot be understood as politically correct or as promoting politically correct science. On the other hand, politically correct arguments (in this narrower sense) can be used also by works speaking against the feminist or politically correct agenda in science., and Ondřej Beran.
This article focuses on a critical analysis of some feminist epistemological initiatives that have been inspired by W. V. O. Quine’s project to naturalise epistemology. It identifies the points of convergence between feminist and naturalistic approaches to the problem of knowledge and science, as well as the means whereby the similarities between these two approaches are reflected at the meta-epistemological level. It also looks at the empiricist focus of naturalising feminist approaches in order to highlight the fruitfulness of this epistemological strategy evolving in collaboration with empirical science. This aim of this study is to argue in favour of the view that the naturalistic perspective is particularly suited to feminist epistemological projects that offer critical reflections on science.