Na souboru 109 docentů a profesorů psychologie jsou ukázány různé parametry publikační aktivity podle databáze Web of Science (WoS). 41 % sledovaných docentů a profesorů publikuje pouze v domácích časopisech, z toho 7 % nepublikuje v časopisech uvedených ve WoS vůbec. 29 % souboru (32 osob) nebylo ani jednou citováno, 40 % sledovaných nemá ani jednu citaci článku, kde by docent/profesor byl prvním autorem. 28 % souboru má h-index roven 0. Vysoký počet publikací (70 a více) měli podle WoS docenti a profesoři Kebza, Nakonečný, Břicháček, Kožený, Vymětal, Kratochvíl, Křivohlavý a Hoskovec, struktura prací (články vs. abstrakta aj. publikační výstupy) se ale u autorů liší. K časopisům s nejvyšším impakt faktorem, v nichž čeští psychologové publikovali, patřil American Journal of Psychiatry (prof. Kožený, 1997) a American Psychologist (prof. Hoskovec a prof. Janoušek, 2004). Největší celkové citovanosti dosáhli profesoři a docenti Kožený, Fraňková a Balcar. and Various parameters of publication activity according to the Web of Science are demonstrated on the sample of 109 associate professors and professors in psychology. 41 % of the sample publish only in Czech journals, 7 % do not publish in journals listed in the Web of Science at all. 29 % of the sample (32 persons) have not been cited at all, 40 % do not have any citation of a paper where associated professor/professor is the first author. The h-index equals 0 in 28 % of the sample. According to the Web of Science, associated professors and professors Kebza, Nakonečný, Břicháček, Kožený, Vymětal, Kratochvíl, Křivohlavý and Hoskovec had high number of publications (70 and more) although the types of publications vary (full papers vs. abstracts and other publication outputs). Among the journals with the highest impact factor, where Czech psychologists published, were American Journal of Psychiatry (professor Kožený, 1997) and American Psychologist (professors Hoskovec and Janoušek, 2004). The authors with the highest citations (in total) were Kožený, Fraňková and Balcar.
The citation frequency of papers on invasion ecology published between 1981 and 2003 and that had accumulated at least 30 citations on the Web of Science on 9 August 2006 was analysed. The dataset comprised 329 papers and 27,240 citations. For each paper, the total number of citations was recorded and the annual citation rate (number of citations per year) was calculated. Papers were classified into broad research fields: plant invasions, animal invasions, biological control, and general papers (reviews and syntheses). Eight papers were cited more than 300 times, five of them dealt with general topics, and the mean value of the total number of citations across the whole data set is 82.8±73.1. The mean annual citation rate is 11.5±11.3 citations per year; six studies received on average at least 50 citations each year. About a half (50.8%) of papers in the data set deal with plant invasions. General papers are significantly more cited than papers from the other categories. The annual citation rate increased with time over the analysed period (1981–2003), by 1.0 citations per year. To compare the trends in invasion ecology with those in other fields of ecology, comparable data were compiled for population ecology and dynamics, and global change. The annual citation rate for invasion ecology as a whole increased faster than that for population ecology and dynamics, but not exponentially as is the case with studies on global change. The best-cited papers on invasion ecology were distributed among most of the top ecology journals. Those published in Oikos, Journal of Ecology, Ecological Applications and BioScience are cited 3.8–5.8 times more than the average for these journals (based on the impact factor). Papers on biodiversity, community ecology, impact, invasibility, dispersal, population ecology, competition, resources, genetical issues, biological control and species invasiveness received the highest total number of citations. However, measured by the annual citation rate, the hottest current topics in invasion ecology are the effect of global change on invasions, the role of natural enemies, character of the invasion process, evolutionary aspects, invasibility of communities and ecosystem processes. Some topics are disproportionally more cited than studied and vice versa. Studies on plant and animal invasions differ in focus: the topics of invasibility, biodiversity, resources, species invasiveness and population genetics are more emphasized in botanical studies, dispersal, competition, impact and pathways in papers dealing with animal invasions. Studies of grasslands and marine environment are most frequently cited in botanical and zoological studies, respectively. Most of the highly cited papers deal with multiple species; only 14 plant species and four animal species are the primary focus of one or more of the highly-cited papers. Twenty-two authors (4.5% of the total involved in the papers analysed), each with seven or more contributions cited at least 30 times, together contributed 49.4% of the most-cited papers, and attracted 55.6% of the total number of citations.