The xanthophyll cycle and the water-water cycle had different functional significance in chilling-sensitive sweet pepper upon exposure to chilling temperature (4 °C) under low irradiance (100 µmol m-2 s-1) for 6 h. During chilling stress, effects of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) on photosystem 2 (PS2) in dithiothreitol (DTT) fed leaves remained distinguishable from that of the water-water cycle in diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) fed leaves. In DTT-fed leaves, NPQ decreased greatly accompanied by visible inhibition of the de-epoxidized ratio of the xanthophyll cycle, and maximum photochemical efficiency of PS2 (Fv/Fm) decreased markedly. Thus the xanthophyll cycle-dependent NPQ could protect PS2 through energy dissipation under chilling stress. However, NPQ had a slighter effect on photosystem 1 (PS1) in DTT-fed leaves than in DDTC-fed leaves, whereas effects of the water-water cycle on PS1 remained distinguishable from that of NPQ. Inhibiting superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity increased the accumulation of O2, the oxidation level of P700 (P700+) decreased markedly relative to the control and DTT-fed leaves. Both Fv/Fm and NPQ changed little in DDTC-fed leaves accompanied by little change of (A+Z)/(V+A+Z). This is the active oxygen species inducing PS1 photoinhibition in sweet pepper. The water-water cycle can be interrupted easily at chilling temperature. We propose that during chilling stress under low irradiance, the xanthophyll cycle-dependent NPQ has the main function to protect PS2, whereas the water-water cycle is not only the pathway to dissipate energy but also the dominant factor causing PS1 chilling-sensitivity in sweet pepper. and X.-G. Li ... [et al.].
The effects of chilling treatment (4 °C) under low irradiance, LI (100 μmol m-2 s-1) and in the dark on subsequent recovery of photosynthesis in chilling-sensitive sweet pepper leaves were investigated by comparing the ratio of quantum yields of photosystem (PS) 2 and CO2 assimilation, ΦPS2/ΦCO2, measured in normal air (21 % O2, NA) and low O2-air (2% O2, LOA), and by analyzing chlorophyll (Chl) a fluorescence parameters. Chilling treatment in the dark had little effect on Fv/Fm and ΦPS2/ΦCO2, but it caused the decrease of net photosynthetic rate (PN) under saturating irradiance after 6-h chilling treatment, indicating that short-term chilling alone did not induce PS2 photoinhibition. Furthermore, photorespiration and Mehler reaction also did not obviously change during subsequent recovery after chilling stress in the dark. During chilling treatment under LI, there were obvious changes in Fv/Fm and ΦPS2/ΦCO2, determined in NA or LOA. Fv/Fm could recover fully in 4 h at 25 °C, and ΦPS2/ΦCO2 increased at the end of the treatment, as determined in both NA and LOA. During subsequent recovery, ΦPS2/ΦCO2 in LOA decreased faster than in NA. Thus the Mehler reaction might play an important role during chilling treatment under LI, and photorespiration was an important process during the subsequent recovery. The recovery of PN under saturating irradiance determined in NA and LOA took about 50 h, implying that there were some factors besides CO2 assimilation limiting the recovery of photosynthesis. From the progress of reduced P700 and the increase of the Mehler reaction during chilling under LI we propose that active oxygen species were the factors inducing PS1 photoinhibition, which prevented the recovery of photosynthesis in optimal conditions because of the slow recovery of the oxidizable P700. and X.-G. Li ... [et al.].