Annotated corpus of 350 decision of Czech top-tier courts (Supreme Court, Supreme Administrative Court, Constitutional Court).
Every decision is annotated by two trained annotators and then manually adjudicated by one trained curator to solve possible disagreements between annotators. Adjudication was conducted non-destructively, therefore dataset contains all original annotations.
Corpus was developed as training and testing material for reference recognition tasks. Dataset contains references to other court decisions and literature. All references consist of basic units (identifier of court decision, identification of court issuing referred decision, author of book or article, title of book or article, point of interest in referred document etc.), values (polarity, depth of discussion etc.).
Annotated corpus of 350 decision of Czech top-tier courts (Supreme Court, Supreme Administrative Court, Constitutional Court).
Every decision is annotated by two trained annotators and then manually adjudicated by one trained curator to solve possible disagreements between annotators. Adjudication was conducted non-destructively, therefore corpus (raw) contains all original annotations.
Corpus was developed as training and testing material for reference recognition tasks. Dataset contains references to other court decisions and literature. All references consist of basic units (identifier of court decision, identification of court issuing referred decision, author of book or article, title of book or article, point of interest in referred document etc.), values (polarity, depth of discussion etc.).
Annotated corpus of 350 decision of Czech top-tier courts (Supreme Court, Supreme Administrative Court, Constitutional Court).
280 decisions were annotated by one trained annotator and then manually adjudicated by one trained curator. 70 decisions were annotated by two trained annotators and then manually adjudicated by one trained curator. Adjudication was conducted destructively, therefore dataset contains only the correct annotations and does not contain all original annotations.
Corpus was developed as training and testing material for text segmentation tasks. Dataset contains decision segmented into Header, Procedural History, Submission/Rejoinder, Court Argumentation, Footer, Footnotes, and Dissenting Opinion. Segmentation allows to treat different parts of text differently even if it contains similar linguistic or other features.
This is the Czech Court Decisions Corpus (CzCDC 1.0). This corpus contains whole texts of the decisions from three top-tier courts (Supreme, Supreme Administrative and Constitutional court) in Czech republic. Court decisions are published from 1st January 1993 to 30th September 2018.
The language of decisions is Czech. Content of decisions is unedited and obtained directly from the competent court.
Decisions are in .txt format in three folders divided by courts.
Corpus contains three .csv files containing the list of all decisions with four columns:
- name of the file: exact file name of a decision with extension .txt;
- decision identifier (docket number): official identification of the decision as issued by the court;
- date of decision: in ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DD);
- court abbreviation: SupCo for Supreme Court, SupAdmCo for Supreme Administrative Court, ConCo for Constitutional Court
Statistics:
- SupCo: 111 977 decisions, 23 699 639 lines, 224 061 129 words, 1 462 948 200 bits;
- SupAdmCo: 52 660 decisions, 18 069 993 lines, 137 839 985 words, 1 067 826 507 bits;
- ConCo: 73 086 decisions, 6 178 371 lines, 98 623 753 words, 664 657 755 bits
- all courts combined: 237 723 decisions, 47 948 003 lines, 460 524 867 words, 3 195 432 462 bits