During the last two decades, genotyping of African rodents has revealed important hidden diversity within morphologically cryptic genera, such as Rhabdomys. Although the distribution of Rhabdomys is known historically, its diversity has been revealed only recently, and information about the distribution range of its constituent taxa is limited. The present study contributes to clarifying the distribution of Rhabdomys taxa, primarily in southern Africa, and identifies gaps in our knowledge, by: 1) compiling the available information on its distribution; and 2) significantly increasing the number of geo-localised and genotyped specimens (n = 2428) as well as the localities (additional 48 localities) sampled. We present updated distribution maps, including the occurrence and composition of several contact zones. A long-term monitoring of three contact zones revealed their instability, and raises questions as to the role of demography, climate, and interspecific competition on species range limits. Finally, an analysis of external morphological traits suggests that tail length may be a reliable taxonomic trait to distinguish between mesic and arid taxa of Rhabdomys. Tail length variation in Rhabdomys and other rodents has been considered to be an adaptation to climatic (thermoregulation) and/or to habitat (climbing abilities) constraints, which has still to be confirmed in Rhabdomys.
Two chromosomal races of the house moue occur in central Tunisia: a standard type (2n = 40) and a Robertsonian race (2n = 22). Although contact between races is not restricted, hybrid populations are rare. Patterns of mate preference between wild mice of the two races suggest that, although incipient, this premating divergence could limit the number of crosses between races in nature. In this paper we compare sexual preference of laboratory-born mice and their parents caught as adults in the wild with the aim to assess whether the social context of development to adulthood could influence expression of preference. We predict that in the absence of such influence, parents and laboratory-born offspring should show a comparable pattern of preference. Results show that offspring preference is always lower than and not related to that of their parents. However, a significant pair effect exist leading us to group parents and offspring into three categories according to the parents' preference: homokaryotypic, heterokaryotypic, or dissimilar. Offspring exhibit a preference, which is consistent with that of their parents, only in two cases: male offspring of the standard race when both parents show a heterokaryotypic preference; all offspring when the homokaryotypic preference of fathers is high. Discrepancy between preferences of wild-caught mice and their laboratory-born progeny suggests that, here, preference may be partly influenced by social conditions experienced before and during adulthood.