The article offers a semantic classification of pronominal-adverb clauses expressing broad manner. The pronoun ten incorporated into the head clause most often by a secondary preposition or as a part of a multiverbation unit anticipates a subordinate clause of broad manner introduced by a pronominal relative adverb. The centre of broad-manner clauses is formed by clauses expressing narrow manner, extent or degree, means, accompanying circumstances. Clauses expressing exception and respect are close to the periphery. The periphery is formed by clauses expressing appropriate action and clauses with a relationship of attachment.
In the frame of the formal-semantic level description of the language system, complex sentence with paratactic subordinate clauses is delimited on the complex-sentence element level. In this type of complex sentence, subordinate clauses of the same complex-sentence element role are connected by a paratactic (from the formal-semantic point of view) connective (special paratactic connectives are found in apposition). A classifikacion of complex sentences with paratactic subordinate clauses is presented as a hierarchized complex-sentence system. In the first phase of the classification, a given complex sentence containing three or more clauses is classified according to the semantic-syntactic relationships (coordination, restricted coordination, determination, restricted determination, apposition). In the second phase, in coordination (or restricted coordination) and apposition, either the hypotactic connective is repeated, or the individual subordinate clauses are introduced by different connectives; coordination display also ellipsis of the hypotactic connective in the second clause. In the third phase of classification, semantic relationships among the subordinate clauses (copulative, escalating, adversative, disjunctive) are identified in coordination; in the various hypotactic connectives, their word-class role is noticed.
On the basis of the material of the corpus SYN, the article deals, at first, with the description of morphologically frozen expressions jakživ, jaktěživ with an adverbial meaning ''never'' in negative clauses, while these expressions are, due to their ending, in syntactic agreement in gender and number with the grammatical subject. Also this agreement in positive clauses, where the frozen expressions mean ''ever (in one’s life)'', is briefly mentioned. However, the principal aim of the article is to show that the syntactic adverbialisation of these expressions in negative clauses causes the disturbance of this agreement, cf. jaktěživo neměl názor ''never in his life had he an opinion'', while there are two possible results of this adverbialisation: the forms of neuter jaktěživo, jakživo are more common in Bohemia, while the forms of masculine jaktěživ, jakživ are used rather in Moravia. The author interprets the frequency of both concordant and non-concordant (frozen) expressions, ordered according to their descending frequency in SYN.