The present paper is a reply to the article Perspektivy korpusové lingvistiky: deskripce, nebo explanace by František Štícha (2015) which is a critique of recent studies by Radek Čech (2014) and Jan Chromý (2014). It is shown that Štícha’s argumentation is based on an inaccurate reading of the two criticized studies. Also, Štícha’s conception of corpus linguistics as a discipline which aims to capture the morphological and syntactical norm of well-educated people is rather limited. This narrow-minded view seems to be another reason of Štícha’s misunderstanding of the criticized papers.
A dictionary of morphologically segmented word forms in Czech. Rules of manual segmentation are described in Pelegrinová, K., Mačutek, J., Čech, R. (2021). The Menzerath-Altmann law as the relation between lengths of words and morphemes in Czech. Jazykovedný časopis, 72, 405-414. The dictionary is based on short stories, fairy tales, letters and studies written by Karel Čapek.
A dictionary of morphologically segmented word forms in Czech. Rules of manual segmentation are described in Pelegrinová, K., Mačutek, J., Čech, R. (2021). The Menzerath-Altmann law as the relation between lengths of words and morphemes in Czech. Jazykovedný časopis, 72, 405-414. The dictionary is based on short stories, fairy tales, letters and studies written by Karel Čapek.