Dva pohledy na vývoj českého poválečného syntaktického myšlení

Title:

Dva pohledy na vývoj českého poválečného syntaktického myšlení
Two views on the Development of the Czech post-war Syntactic Research

Creator:

Karlík, Petr and Panevová, Jarmila

Identifier:

https://cdk.lib.cas.cz/client/handle/uuid:2542d803-54a2-428b-9e2d-c03ef8a2a9ff
uuid:2542d803-54a2-428b-9e2d-c03ef8a2a9ff

Subject:

syntax, linguistic theory, structuralism, generative grammar, two-level valency syntax, functional generative description, grammar, lexicon, teorie jazyka, strukturalismus, generativní gramatika, dvourovinná valenční syntax, funkční generativní popis, gramatika, and slovník

Type:

model:article and TEXT

Format:

bez média and svazek

Description:

The authors present their respective views on the development of the Czech post-war syntactic studies. Their approach is influenced by the fact that they were educated by the different syntactic schools: thus the paper is a combination of Prague’s and Brno´s views. V. Šmilauer´s Novočeská skladba (Syntax of Modern Czech, 1947) is understood as a source of the contemporary research of the Czech syntax. The paper describes the results reached by individual investigators as well as the results of the research teams. According to the authors´ opinion, Two-Level Valency Syntax (represented by F. Daneš and his close collaborators and reflected in the Czech Academic Grammar) and Functional Generative Grammar (developed by P. Sgall and his colleagues) form the main paradigms of the Czech syntax since 1960. Both theories incorporate the results of the classical Praguian functional approach as well as results of the generative paradigm. The authors conclude that the Prague‘s and Brno´s views on the development of Czech syntactic studies are not incompatible but rather complementary and that the methods of formal and corpus linguistics are attractive and useful for the young researchers.

Language:

Czech

Rights:

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
policy:public

Coverage:

34-53

Source:

Korpus - gramatika - axiologie: časopis pro korpusový výzkum a hodnocení jazyka | 2012 | Number:5

Harvested from:

CDK

Metadata only:

false