Why the possible is not impossible but is unlikely: a response to our colleagues

Title:

Why the possible is not impossible but is unlikely: a response to our colleagues

Creator:

Martin, Luther H. and Wiebe, Donald

Identifier:

https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/125400

Subject:

religious studies, religious concerns, history of the study of religion, cognitive science of religion, and Study of Religions

Type:

Article

Format:

text/pdf

Description:

This paper is a response to the responses to our paper "Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion" by Hans Gerald Hödl, Hubert Seiwert, Radek Kundt, Tomáš Bubík, and Kocku von Stuckrad, published in this same issue of Religio: Revue pro religionistiku. Some of the respondents actually overstate our position. We have claimed, and still now claim, that a fully scientific program of "Religious Studies", even if possible, is highly unlikely to ever be achieved.

Language:

English

Rights:

unknown

Relation:

https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/cs/handle/11222.digilib/125392
https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/cs/handle/11222.digilib/125393
https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/cs/handle/11222.digilib/125394
https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/cs/handle/11222.digilib/125395
https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/cs/handle/11222.digilib/125396
https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/cs/handle/11222.digilib/125397
https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/en/handle/11222.digilib/124610
https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/en/_flysystem/fedora/pdf/125400.pdf

Harvested from:

Digital Library of Faculty of Arts of Masaryk University

Metadata only:

false

Date:

2012