Search

Start Over Subject soukromá korespondence

1. Dopisy prof. E. Macha prof. F. Waldovi

Creator:
Wald, Emil
Format:
print, bez média, and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
Mach, Ernst, 1838-1916, Wald, František, 1861-1930, fyzika, soukromá korespondence, physics, private correxpondence, 6, and 53
Language:
Czech
Description:
Článek z Elektronického obzoru 27(7), 104-105 (1938). and Emil Wald. (Společný úvod k tomuto a dalším 2 textům uvádí redakce na straně 249.)
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ and policy:public

2. Josef Hlávka a Antonín Dvořák

Creator:
Tereza Kibicová
Format:
print, bez média, and svazek
Type:
article, články, model:article, and TEXT
Subject:
Biografie, Hlávka, Josef, 1831-1908, Dvořák, Antonín, 1841-1904, věda a umění, přátelé a spolupracovníci, soukromá korespondence, science and art, friends and associates, private correspondence, 8, and 929
Language:
Czech
Description:
There was a close relationship between the patron of Czech science and the arts and the founder and first president of Czech Academy of Science and the Arts, Josef Hlávka, and one of the most famous Czech composers, Antonín Dvořák. and Tereza Kibicová.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

3. Příspěvek k popisu významů novočeských stupňovacích forem: (na materiále korespondenčních korpusů)

Creator:
Adam, Robert
Format:
bez média and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
New Czech, degrees of comparison, comparison, elation, private correspondence, nová čeština, stupňování, komparace, elace, and soukromá korespondence
Language:
Czech
Description:
The paper investigates the degrees of comparison in New Czech using two corpora of private correspondence as a material source: the corpus of contemporary private letters KSKdopisy (Hladká et al., 2005) and a preparatory version of the corpus consisting of the letters written by or addressed to poet, journalist and politician Karel Havlíček (1821-1856). Distinguishing pricipially relative and absolute meanings (i.e. comparison and elation, respectively), it tries to show that with relative meaning, the question whether using a comparative or superlative form of a quality word implies the positive presence of the quality (rather than the opposite), is (a) not to be answered generally, and (b) often irrelevant in communication. The paper describes various relative and absolute meanings of the degrees of comparison and the clues to their interpretation. Finally, it deals with comparative and superlative forms with modified/weakened meanings.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public