Search

Start Over Subject schizma

1. A Companion to the Great Western Schism (1378-1417), eds. Joëlle Rollo-Kloster - Thomas M. Izbicki, Brill, Leiden - Boston 2009 (= Brill´s Companions to the Christian Tradition 17), 467 s., ISBN 978-90-04-16277-8

Creator:
Ivan Hlaváček
Format:
print
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
14.-15. století, církevní dějiny, papežové, schizma, church history, popes, schism, Evropa, Europe, 5, and 271/279
Language:
Czech
Description:
[autor recenze] Ivan Hlaváček.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

2. Clavis scientiae et clavis potestatis. La causa Hus entre le pouvoir épiscopal, universitaire et conciliaire

Creator:
Provvidente, Sebastián
Format:
print
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
Hus, Jan, asi 1371-1415, Katolická církev., Kostnický koncil, (1414-1418), 14.-15. století, církevní dějiny, eklesiologie, schizma, church history, ecclesiology, schism, 5, and 27-9
Language:
Czech
Description:
The Schism from 1378 evoked an essential need for a redefinition of doctrinal authority within the church. One of the aims of this study is to show that the Council of Constance did not condemn Hus’ theses only from the doctrinal perspective but also endeavoured to consolidate a certain modus procedendi in relation to the scholar’s heresy. In the context of Hus’ cause, it is evident that the doctrinal questions had great gravity in the eyes of the council fathers. Most likely for the reason of this great attention being paid to the theological aspects, attention was not paid to the fact that in parallel with the condemnation of Hus’ theses some of the main representatives of the council endeavoured for the consolidation of a certain modus procedendi in the cases of the processes whose beginning can be found within the universities. Both in the case of Wycliffe and in the case of Hus, the council confirmed the previous condemnation of university instances in accord with ecclesiastical power. The promise of a public hearing of Hus aroused great disorder, because in that two entirely opposing evidential principles clashed, the theological and legal. The basic problem was in the question of how to define the relation between the two authorities: the Holy Scripture and the Church. The schism from 1378 and general inquiry about the principles in the instances of ecclesiastical power aroused a renewed interest in this problem. Nevertheless, in the thought of some significant council fathers, the principle appeared that auctoritas ecclesiae should serve as a guarantee of the proper interpretation of the Bible. Besides the ambiguity between the two evidential principles (legal and theological), the core of the dispute between Hus and the council fathers lay precisely in this ecclesiological problem. A significant role in the legal course of Hus’ process was analogically played also by the question of the infallibility of the council. and Sebastián Provvidente.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

4. Glosa k biografii Pavla z Janovic

Creator:
Zdeňka Hledíková
Format:
print
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
pražský arcijáhen, Pavel z Janovic a Vimperka, činný 14. století, 14. století, papežství, schizma, papacy, schism, Avignon (Francie), Avignon (France), Western schism, papal election, Pietro Corsini, 8, and 929
Language:
Czech
Description:
The study maps the as-yet unknown beginnings of the life and career of Pavel of Janovice, archdeacon of Prague, from whose activity a visitation protocol of 1379-1382 has been preserved. Those were connected with Cardinal Pietro Corsini, legate at the court of Charles IV in 1363-1364. In 1371, Pavel became a cardinal´s familiar; he acquired a doctorate in law at the university in Avignon in 1372. He was likely the one who took the official letter on the second papal election of 1378 and with that a personal letter from Corsini to Charles IV. After his arrival in Prague, Pavel used his earlier expectative and acquired the just vacated dignity of the Prague Chapter and began to visit as the archdeacon already in October of that year. A return to his cardinal was prevented by Corsini´s remaining in obedience to Avignon, whereas Bohemia remained in Roman obedience. and Zdeňka Hledíková.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public