The absolute population density of adult Pardosa agrestis (Westring, 1862), the dominant epigeic spider species in many arable lands in Central Europe, was quantified in two alfalfa fields using a multiple mark-recapture method. The resulting density estimates are presented together with catch data from simultaneously performed suction sampling and pitfall trapping. Two week long mark-recapture surveys were conducted in August 1995 and 1996 using grids of 11 × 11 live-catching pitfall traps covering a square area of 400 m2 in the first, and 900 m2 in the second survey. The trap checking and marking procedure, using individual codes, was done daily. Over 5,000 spiders were marked in the two surveys. The number of spiders caught varied greatly between days. The recapture rate was also variable, ranging between 5-19%. Recaptured animals moved considerable daily distances, marked animals left the area of the trapping grid within a few days. Population sizes were estimated for 3 day time windows during which period the population could be considered closed. Spider densities were calculated from the estimated abundances and the capture area, which consisted of the grid area plus a boundary strip calculated from the estimated movement ranges of spiders. The resulting densities were close to 2 males and 1 female per m2 in the first, and 4.5 males and 4.5 females per m2 in the second experimental site. Suction sampling caught very few adult individuals and gave unsatisfactory data for statistical comparison. Live catching pitfall trap catches did not correlate with the derived mark-recapture density estimates across the short time windows, but for the entire trapping sessions the catches were consistent with the density estimates.
Quantitative community-wide moth surveys frequently employ flight-interception traps equipped with UV-light emitting sources as attractants. It has long been known that moth species differ in their responsiveness to light traps. We studied how the settling behaviour of moths at a light trap may further contribute to sampling bias. We observed the behaviour of 1426 moths at a light tower. Moths were classified as either, settling and remaining still after arrival, or continually moving on the gauze for extended periods of time. Moths that did not move after settling may not end up in the sampling container of the light trap and therefore are under-represented in automated trap samples relative to their true proportions in the community. Our analyses revealed highly significant behavioural differences between moths that differed in body size. Small moths were more likely to remain stationary after settling. As a corollary, representatives of three taxa, which in Europe are predominantly small species (Nolidae, Geometridae: Eupitheciini, Erebidae: Lithosiini), usually settled down immediately, whereas most other moths remained active on or flying around the trap for some time. Moth behaviour was also modulated by ambient temperature. At high temperatures, they were less likely to settle down immediately, but this behavioural difference was most strongly apparent among medium-sized moths. These results indicate the likely extent of the sampling bias when analysing and interpreting automated light-trap samples. Furthermore, to control for temperature modulated sampling bias temperature should always be recorded when sampling moths using flight-interception traps. and Mirko Wölfling, Mira C. Becker, Britta Uhl, Anja Traub, Konrad Fiedler.