Many RNA recognition motif (RRM)-containing proteins are known to exist in chloroplasts. Major members of the RRM protein family, which are chloroplast ribonucleoproteins (cpRNPs), have been investigated in seed plants, including tobacco and Arabidopsis thaliana, but never in early land plants, such as bryophytes. In this study, we surveyed RRM proteins encoded in the moss Physcomitrella patens genome and predicted 25 putative chloroplast RRM proteins. Among them, two RRM-containing proteins, PpRBP2a and PpRBP2b, resembled cpRNPs and were thus referred to as cpRNP-like proteins. However, knockout mutants of either one or two PpRBP2 genes exhibited a wild type-like phenotype. Unlike Arabidopsis cpRNPs, the levels of mRNA accumulation in chloroplasts were not affected in the PpRBP2 knockout mutants. In addition, the efficiency of RNA editing was also not altered in the mutants. This suggests that PpRBP2a and 2b may be functionally distinct from Arabidopsis cpRNPs., H. Uchiyama, M. Ichinose, M. Sugita., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
Recent studies have demonstrated that some microRNAs (miRNAs) inhibit bone formation by inhibiting the translation of specific genes. Several in vitro studies have suggested that miR - 23a inhibits osteogenic differentiation by suppressing the translation of Runx2, a transcription factor essential for osteoblastogenesis, and of Sa tb2, a member of the special AT-rich binding protein family. In the pr esent study, we used a gain -of-function approach to determine the roles of miR -23a in bone formation and homeostasis in vivo . The miR -23a transgenic (Tg) mice grew normally and their body size and weight were similar to those of wild -type (WT) littermates. Bone structure and morphology were similar in Tg and WT mice. Furthermore, the numbers of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, as well as their activities in bone were similar between Tg and WT mice. Our results indicate that miR -23 has limited roles in bone form ation and maintenance in vivo in mice., J. Park, S. Wada, T. Ushida, T. Akimoto., and Obsahuje bibliografii
Tuto otázku si kladou lidé již od počátku lidstva. Pro členy Laboratoře biochemie a molekulární biologie zárodečných buněk v Ústavu živočišné fyziologie a genetiky AV ČR v Liběchově je odpověď jasná, jelikož na počátek vzniku nového jedince nahlíží prostřednictvím molekulární biologie. První bylo vajíčko. and Denisa Jansová.