1 - 3 of 3
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. Horní vrstva měšťanské společnosti v domácí historiografii pozdního středověku a raného novověku: Nástin vývoje terminologie a dalších směrů bádání
- Creator:
- Josef Kadeřábek
- Format:
- Type:
- article, články, model:article, and TEXT
- Subject:
- Demografie. Populace, historická demografie, historical demography, Notables, elites, patriciate, townsmen, city, 18, and 314
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- The study aims at presenting the development of research on the upper level of bourgeois society in Czech historiography. It focuses on the comparison of crucial terms used in these discussions, such as patriciate, notables and elites., Josef Kadeřábek., and Obsahuje seznam literatury
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public
3. Romanian research on elites of the 19th and 20th centuries
- Creator:
- Popovici, Vlad
- Type:
- article, model:article, and TEXT
- Subject:
- elites, historiography, Romania, 19th century, and 20th century
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- The paper offers a synthetic overview of the historical and social sciences writings on 19th and 20th century Romanian elites. Following the original local sociological constructs developed during the interwar period, the early socialist regime stopped almost all research on the topic for the next two decades. The interest rose again slowly in the 1970s and 1980s, when preliminary investigations highlighted some of the future research subjects: intellectuals, economic, and political elites. After 1989, historians were the first to enter the field, opening workshops on the previously mentioned categories, and more recently on ecclesiastical, military, and administrative elites. Social and political scientists followed shortly, focusing mainly – but not exclusively – on the socialist and post-socialist elites. Despite the flourishing period of the last two decades, and the generally positive trend, the historical research on elites in Romania produced mainly empirical studies. The methodological and theoretical framework was left unapproached, partly due to a lack of tradition, partly because of the low level of collaboration between historians and social scientists.
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ and policy:public