Annotated corpus of 350 decision of Czech top-tier courts (Supreme Court, Supreme Administrative Court, Constitutional Court).
Every decision is annotated by two trained annotators and then manually adjudicated by one trained curator to solve possible disagreements between annotators. Adjudication was conducted non-destructively, therefore dataset contains all original annotations.
Corpus was developed as training and testing material for reference recognition tasks. Dataset contains references to other court decisions and literature. All references consist of basic units (identifier of court decision, identification of court issuing referred decision, author of book or article, title of book or article, point of interest in referred document etc.), values (polarity, depth of discussion etc.).
Annotated corpus of 350 decision of Czech top-tier courts (Supreme Court, Supreme Administrative Court, Constitutional Court).
Every decision is annotated by two trained annotators and then manually adjudicated by one trained curator to solve possible disagreements between annotators. Adjudication was conducted non-destructively, therefore corpus (raw) contains all original annotations.
Corpus was developed as training and testing material for reference recognition tasks. Dataset contains references to other court decisions and literature. All references consist of basic units (identifier of court decision, identification of court issuing referred decision, author of book or article, title of book or article, point of interest in referred document etc.), values (polarity, depth of discussion etc.).
Michal Bauer, Jana Cahlíková, Dagmara Celik Katreniak, Julie Chytilová, Lubomír Cingl, and Tomáš Želinský., Obsahuje bibliografii a bibliografické odkazy, and České a anglické resumé
Název z obálky and Pod názvem: Akademie věd České republiky; Filosofický ústav AV ČR; Archiv Jana Patočky, Centrum pro teoretická studia Univerzity Karlovy a Akademie věd České republiky