| [1] |
|
|---|
| [2] |
132 C. 46. 1412, Oct. 18.
|
|---|
| [3] |
racionabilibus citatus in curia Romana non comparui,^ tum quia insidie
|
|---|
| [4] |
undique posite sunt^ michi" in itinere, tum quia me aliena fecerunt
|
|---|
| [5] |
pericula*^ cautum,'! magistrorum Stanislai** et Stephani Palecz spoliacio
|
|---|
| [6] |
"et" incarceracio,” qui" in Bononia peceuniis et aliis rebus," volentes
|
|---|
| [7] |
citati parere," sunt spoliati et incarcerati turpiter et tractati" tamquam
|
|---|
| [8] |
malefici/" nulla penitus audiencia precedente, tum eciam, quia mei pro-
|
|---|
| [9] |
curatores voluerunt se" ad penam ignis cum^" quocumque volente*?
|
|---|
| [10] |
contra me opponere ac' partem' se' ponere! in Romana curia obligare,"
|
|---|
| [11] |
tum eciam, quia meum procuratorem ? legittimum** incarceraverunt* in^?
|
|---|
| [12] |
prefata curia, nulla culpa, ut estimo,* exigente, tum*^" eciam® quia con-
|
|---|
| [13] |
cordatus eram sancte memorie cum domino*" Sbincone* Pragensi archi-
|
|---|
| [14] |
episcopo * per graciam domini regis,? inter quem dominum Sbinconem* et
|
|---|
| [15] |
me aliosque magistros pronuneciaverunt principes et domini consiliumque
|
|---|
| [16] |
domini regis et sua apposuerunt sigilla," quod dominus archiepiscopus
|
|---|
| [17] |
scriberet domino* pape, quod errores hereticos in regno Boemie," in“
|
|---|
| [18] |
civitate "" Pragensi*" et in^ marchionatu Moravie nescit, quodque nullus?
|
|---|
| [19] |
de heresi est^* convictus, et quod mecum est cum aliisque magistris ple-
|
|---|
| [20] |
narie* concordatus." Eciam debebat?! scribere, quod ** dominus aposto-
|
|---|
| [21] |
licus me a“ comparicione, citacionibus*" et excomunicacione absolveret.*"
|
|---|
| [22] |
Cum igitur omnium iurium antiquorum," tam divinorum*^ Veteris
|
|---|
| [23] |
et Novi testamenti, quam canonum extat?" disposicio,! quod^* iudices
|
|---|
| [24] |
loca visitent," ubi^ dicitur^ crimen? comissum," ibique^' inquirant
|
|---|
| [25] |
ed cit. non comp. in cur. Rom. Ep, Op. — -*ins. pos. sunt michi undiq. Vdb. —
|
|---|
| [26] |
cf me al. per. fec. caut. B, Grs; al. me per. fec. caut. Le; me arena fec. caut. Cp; me fec.
|
|---|
| [27] |
al. per. caut. Trb, Ep, Op; dal$i magistrorum — precedente chybi v Ep, Op. — © Stani-
|
|---|
| [28] |
slay Le, Vnb; Stanisslai B. — *' v Grs dvakrát, na konci f. 99 a na zacátku 99. — c quia
|
|---|
| [29] |
CI, v Trb chybi. — ** pecuniis et aliis B; peccunia et aliis Trb. — *! comparere Cp, Vdb.
|
|---|
| [30] |
— em malifici Cp, Vdb. — *" v Trb za tím s$krtnuto quolibet. — ©“ v Le za tím škrtnuto
|
|---|
| [31] |
opponere. — *Pse oblig. Cp. — cdlegitim. Grs; proc. meum legitt. Vdb; meum proc.
|
|---|
| [32] |
legitim. Ep, Op. — *'incarcerarunt Cl, Ep, Op. — **v Grs nad Skrtnutijm et. — <texi-
|
|---|
| [33] |
stimo Vdb; nul. culp. exig., ut estimo (opr. z existimo) B. — *" tum — absolveret chybt
|
|---|
| [34] |
v Cp, Trb, Vdb, Vnb, Ep, Op. — ©' chybi v CI, Grs. — *" eram cum dom. s. mem. Grs.
|
|---|
| [35] |
— ex Zbynk. Grs. — * v B pred tím Śkrtnuto ep. — © chybi v CI, Grs, Le. — 4* et Grs; v Le
|
|---|
| [36] |
chybf. — 4f quodą. nul. est Grs; neque ullus Cl. — AE chybi v B. — *^ mec. cum aliis-
|
|---|
| [37] |
que mag. est conc. Grs. — 4! Eciam quod debet Grs; v B oprav. jinou rukou z debeat.
|
|---|
| [38] |
— 4k quia Grs. — v B jinou rukou mezi řádky. — ^" v B oprav. jinou rukou z citacio;
|
|---|
| [39] |
citacionis et citacionibus Grs. — "antiquarum Vdb. — do diversorum Le. — "P exstat
|
|---|
| [40] |
Cp, Vdb; extet Ep, Op. — aut Ep, Op. — *' vis. loca Cl, Grs, Le. — *sv Grs škrtnuto
|
|---|
| [41] |
a nad tim jinou rukou: in quibus est; in quibus crimen est Ep, Op. — «t tamen Vdb. —
|
|---|
| [42] |
du commiss. Cp, Grs. — “ et ibi Grs.
|
|---|
| [43] |
* R. 1408; Stanislav a Páleč byli pohnání pro žalobu Němců na filosof. přesvěd-
|
|---|
| [44] |
čení Stanislavovo a jati kardinálem Cossou pro podezření politického poslání; v. o tom
|
|---|
| [45] |
nyní Novotný-Kybal, Hus. — % Jana z Jesenice. — * Václav IV. — % Výpověď otiskl
|
|---|
| [46] |
Palackjj, Doc. str. 497—439. — ?' Srun. Corp. iur. can. c 20 C Ill g 9; de appell. IT, 28, 47;
|
|---|
| [47] |
de lite non contest. II, 6, 4 (Friedberg I 533, II 428, 261); c16 C III g 6 (tam. I, 523), c. 15
|
|---|
| [48] |
C IIIq 5 (I, 518), c 1 C III q 6 (519); srvn. doklady uvedené v Ordo procedendi (č. 101),
|
|---|
| [49] |
a co uvedl Jesenic ve své obrané Husa Op. I, f. 331 n.
|
|---|
