[1] |
|
---|
[2] |
|
---|
[3] |
Mistr Hašek (neznámo blíže, kdo tim minen) zle doráží na Husa pro
|
---|
[4] |
jeho kázání.
|
---|
[5] |
|
---|
[6] |
Rkp. Vysriobrod. N° 83 (— Alt) f. 14 ; rkp. Musea král. č. I E 26 (— Mus)
|
---|
[7] |
fol. 12; rkp. univ. knihouny X F 10 (— Unr) f. 54'—55.
|
---|
[8] |
Sedlak, Hlidka 1911, zvl. ot. Nek. textů I, str. 13—14 (== z Unr).
|
---|
[9] |
Poněvadž běží o totéž kázání, proti kterému bouřil i Mařík Rvačka (v.
|
---|
[10] |
č. 37), náleží list asi do blízké doby, ač ovšem jest nápadné, že Hus, píše
|
---|
[11] |
odpověď Maříkovi, o ném ještě se nezmiňuje. Ponévadz však ani později ne-
|
---|
[12] |
odpověděl, není ten důvod rozhodující.
|
---|
[13] |
Et" ego Magister Hassko" dico tibi, Hus; quod modicum legisti; si
|
---|
[14] |
autem legisti, non intellexisti; si autem intellexisti, ex malicia tenere
|
---|
[15] |
noluisti. Audi apostolum I* Cor. 2* prope finem capituli: „Spiritualis
|
---|
[16] |
homo omnia iudicat, ipse autem a nemine iudicafur^. In quo verbo
|
---|
[17] |
omnes doctores consistunt, dicentes, quod nec imperator nec aliquis rex
|
---|
[18] |
nec dominus nec collator secularis habet aliquam iurisdiecionem/ in sa-
|
---|
[19] |
cerdotes; igitur quidquid faciunt violencie eis vel potestatis," mortaliter
|
---|
[20] |
peccant, ut dicit Augustinus? super illud Psalmi XVIIT^: Dies diei eructat
|
---|
[21] |
verbum, id est spiritualis spiritualem instruat et" corrigat, et * nox nocti,
|
---|
[22] |
id est secularis secularem. Idem? super illud Gen. 1^: Fecit deus duo
|
---|
[23] |
luminaria, luminare! maius, ut preesset diei, id est solem," per! quod'
|
---|
[24] |
signatur! apostolicus," episcopus etc., qui' aliis presint spiritualibus, lu-
|
---|
[25] |
nam, ut nocti presit — imperatorem," et stellas, id est minores offici-
|
---|
[26] |
arios tam spirituales quam seculares, qui quilibet in suo gradu presit
|
---|
[27] |
sua auctoritate sibi subditis et commissis.
|
---|
[28] |
Et dixisti, quod sacerdotes in peccatis mortalibus existentes non
|
---|
[29] |
habent? potestatem dei. Numquid non legisti illud Johannis 19, ubi
|
---|
[30] |
Christus dixit Pilato*: ,Non haberes in me potestatem, nisi esset tibi
|
---|
[31] |
datum desuper. Unde apostolus? Rom. XIII*: ,Omnis anima potesta-
|
---|
[32] |
tibus sublimioribus subdita sit. Non est enim potestas, nisi a deo, que
|
---|
[33] |
autem sunt, a deo ordinata sunt^. Itaque qui resistit potestati, dei ordi-
|
---|
[34] |
nacioni resistit qui autem resistit? deo," ipse' sibi dampnacionem ac-
|
---|
[35] |
2Jtem. Et Unr. — bHasco Mus. — cHuss Mus. — 4diiudicat Alf, Mus. — * con-
|
---|
[36] |
sisstunt Unr. — f iurisdicionem Unr, Mus. — € potestates Mus, Alt. — ^ chybí v Alt, Mus.
|
---|
[37] |
— ichybi v Unr. — * so) Alt, Mus. — ! chybt v Mus. — " appostolieus Mus. — " Mus:
|
---|
[38] |
imperatorem seculari a daisf aZ po commissis chybí. — °habere Alt, Mus. — Presi-
|
---|
[39] |
stunt Alf. — aresistunt Mus. — "ipsi Alf, Mus.
|
---|
[40] |
! I. Cor. 2, 15. — ? Augustinus, Sup. Psalm XVIII (Migne PL 36, 159), spiritus
|
---|
[41] |
spiritui, caro carni; ... spirituales spiritualibus, carnales carnalibus. — 3 V Augustino-
|
---|
[42] |
vych vykladech na Genesi citdtu nenachdzim. — * Joh. 19, 11. — ^ Rom. 12, 1—2.
|
---|
[43] |
* 55 Us
|
---|