| [1] |
L.) Kraj Chrudimsky. 1653
|
|---|
| [2] |
[Juata:] Datum Petro Kdulinecz de Ostromirze et Wilhelmo de Drzela
|
|---|
| [3] |
|
|---|
| [4] |
Petrus Kdulinecz, qui ius regium prosequitur, committit Sobieslao de
|
|---|
| [5] |
Miletinka super lucro et dampno cum potestate substituendi; qui ulterius
|
|---|
| [6] |
committit Nicolao Sseperka.
|
|---|
| [7] |
Petrus de Ostromirze et Wilhelmus de Drzela, qui ius regium prosc-
|
|---|
| [8] |
cuntur castri Rabssteynek etc." protestati sunt coram Johanne de Hazm-
|
|---|
| [9] |
burg iudice et beneficiariis curie, quod de omni iure ipsorum, quodcumque
|
|---|
| [10] |
ipsis competit virtute regie donacionis ad bona et hereditates, videlicet castrum
|
|---|
| [11] |
Rabssteynek, Zestoky, Tyssow, Wleznow cum omnibus pertinenciis, conde-
|
|---|
| [12] |
scenderunt, resignaverunt et dederunt Johanni de Miletinka plene et in
|
|---|
| [13] |
toto, ita ut ipse Sobieslaus respondeat defendentibus et lucrando ius regium
|
|---|
| [14] |
deducat et faciat, prout sue placuerit voluntati cum bonis prenominatis.
|
|---|
| [15] |
Actum feria III post Bonifacii [8. června] anno ete. LVII.
|
|---|
| [16] |
Sobieslaus, qui habet ius regium per condescensionem, committit Ni-
|
|---|
| [17] |
colao Sseperka super lucro et dampno.
|
|---|
| [18] |
Vide memoriam”: Zdenko de Postupiez in Zestocziech nomine Victorini
|
|---|
| [19] |
|
|---|
| [20] |
Vide memoriam Johannes Horyna de Hombicz in Wleznow (folio V)". (4)
|
|---|
| [21] |
Vide memoriam Johannes Horina etc. in Zestocziech (folio 7).'?
|
|---|
| [22] |
Habet locum. Vide in loco.
|
|---|
| [23] |
(*) Vide Zestoky ante II folia.®
|
|---|
| [24] |
(**) Vide memoriam in Tysowa: Paulus et Mathias folio circa A. Item
|
|---|
| [25] |
iterum Paulus?” Habet locum. Vide in presenti folio subtus circa A. (ż).
|
|---|
| [26] |
(***) Vide Wleznow ante vertendo I folium cirea Rowen.?
|
|---|
| [27] |
(f) Wenceslaus de Kwiekna, cuius nomine Hertwik de Ostrozne po-
|
|---|
| [28] |
suit defensam, personaliter paruit, ad suam defensam se recognoscendo. Et
|
|---|
| [29] |
statim ibidem Hertwik prefatus protestatus est coram beneficiariis curie, že
|
|---|
| [30] |
zastupuje jeho Vaňka jakožto jeho jistec v té při, což. sě Rabšteinku do-
|
|---|
| [31] |
týče, aby jemu vysvobodil. Actum feria II post Bonifacii /7. června] anno
|
|---|
| [32] |
|
|---|
| [33] |
Item Wilhelmus, frater Hertwikonis iunior germanus et indivisus, pri-
|
|---|
| [34] |
znal sé personaliter, quod penes fratrem suum similiter zastupuje Wenec-
|
|---|
| [35] |
slaum de Kwiekna, prout et Hertwik, frater suus. Actum sabb. 4 temp.
|
|---|
| [36] |
adv. [18. prosince] anno ete. LVI.
|
|---|
| [37] |
Pro Wenceslao ct Hertwikone docuit tabulis: Also de ose D III ®;
|
|---|
| [38] |
item: Wilhelmus de Ostrozna H VII.
|
|---|
| [39] |
|
|---|
| [40] |
(ttt) Vide litteram testium in scatula: Epik et testes A II, ubi Tynecz.!
|
|---|
| [41] |
(+) Wietorinus de Zumberg prot. est coram beneficiariis curie, quod
|
|---|
| [42] |
defensam suam in Zestoczich dimisit et dimittit plene etin toto Sobieslao
|
|---|
| [43] |
de Miletinka sub hac condicione, quando ius regium idem Sobieslaus de-
|
|---|
| [44] |
ducet, quod eidem Victorino et ipsius fratribus predicta bona debet inta-
|
|---|
