| [1] |
L.) Kraj Chrudimsky. 1695
|
|---|
| [2] |
therine, nate Litkonis de Rozhowiez, defendit bona et hereditates in Srdowie
|
|---|
| [3] |
superius proclamata per mortem Witkonis de Srdowa aut cuiuscumque alte-
|
|---|
| [4] |
rius, dicens eam habere ius melius, quam dominus rex aut aliquis post eum;
|
|---|
| [5] |
et offert eam probaturam tabulis terre, quas prius in priori impetracione
|
|---|
| [6] |
circa suam defensam produxerat(**); iuxta quas sibi datum est pro iure
|
|---|
| [7] |
obtento, et hoc secundum dominorum baronum invencionem. Term. pro-
|
|---|
| [8] |
bandi sabb. 4 temp. penthec. /11. června]. Procopius de Mezilesicz
|
|---|
| [9] |
nomine Anne, sororis sue de ibidem, defendit XXXV sexagenas gr. dotales,
|
|---|
| [10] |
quas in bonis et hereditatibus in villa Srdowie habet, et dicens eam habere
|
|---|
| [11] |
ius melius, quam d. rex aut aliquis post eum, et dicens quod est ibi vzne-
|
|---|
| [12] |
sena, pro quo dotalicio habet fideiussores; et offert eam probaturam secun-
|
|---|
| [13] |
dum dominorum baronum invencionem. Term. probandi in crast. Jeron.
|
|---|
| [14] |
[1. října]. Term. ad idem Anne de Mezilesicz, cuius nomine posita est de-
|
|---|
| [15] |
fensa, sabb. 4 temp. adv. [17. prosince].
|
|---|
| [16] |
Ad postulacionem Katherine virginis, cuius nomine Johannes de Rych-
|
|---|
| [17] |
nowa posuit defensam in Srdowie, domini barones iudicio presidentes assig-
|
|---|
| [18] |
naverunt terminum ad idem sabb. 4 temp. penthec. /8. června] ea de cau-
|
|---|
| [19] |
sa, ut possit sua documenta conquirere ad predictum terminum sine ulte-
|
|---|
| [20] |
riori dilacione. Actum sabb. post Benedicti [23. bfezna/ anno etc. LXV.
|
|---|
| [21] |
Katherina, nata Litkonis de Rozhowicz, defendens in Srdowie, pro-
|
|---|
| [22] |
duxit tabulas ad ius sue defense, quas Sdenko de Postupicz, impetrans,
|
|---|
| [23] |
audivit et interrogatus per beneficiarios, si quid loquitur contra dictas tabu-
|
|---|
| [24] |
las, respondit, quod nichil. Et beneficiarii curie prenominate Katherine iuxta
|
|---|
| [25] |
ipsius tabulas contra ius regium dederunt pro iure obtento. Dedit memoria-
|
|---|
| [26] |
les. Actum feria IIII post Francisci /9. října] anno etc. LXV.
|
|---|
| [27] |
[Juata:] Zdenkoni de Postupiez. Committit Nicolao de Porziezie et
|
|---|
| [28] |
Johanni Sspina de Jenissowiecz, ambobus simul et cuilibet seorsum super
|
|---|
| [29] |
|
|---|
| [30] |
Vide memoriam: Nicolaus de Domassina circa — 3
|
|---|
| [31] |
|
|---|
| [32] |
(**) Produxit tabulas: Bonus virgo, J primo.“
|
|---|
| [33] |
|
|---|
| [34] |
!) Nad řádkou poznamenáno: fides facta.
|
|---|
| [35] |
|
|---|
| [36] |
3) Pamét ta zapsaná na druhé straně listu tím znamením označeného (str. 404") za ná-
|
|---|
| [37] |
písem Chrudimensis zní: Nicolaus de Domassina voluit facere defensam bonorum et here-
|
|---|
| [38] |
ditatum in Srdowie per mortem Witkonis de Srdowa, ubi Sdenko de Postupicz impetraverat,
|
|---|
| [39] |
dicens quod Witko predictus fuit frater suus indivisus. Set non est per beneficiarios curie
|
|---|
| [40] |
admissus, eo quod septimane iuris proclamacionum sunt elapse. Petivit memoriam beneficia-
|
|---|
| [41] |
riorum. Actum feria V post Translacionem s. Wenceslai /6. bfezna] anno etc. LX.
|
|---|
| [42] |
4) Viz výpis uvedený v pozn. 4 při čís. 19 tohoto oddílu napřed na str. 1682.
|
|---|
| [43] |
5) Tim se mini &s. 19 tohoto oddílu.
|
|---|
