Coleman versus Collins: dva odlišné přístupy k teorii jednání v americké sociologii

Title:

Coleman versus Collins: dva odlišné přístupy k teorii jednání v americké sociologii
Coleman versus Collins: the two different approaches towards action theory in American sociology

Creator:

Jiří Šubrt

Identifier:

https://cdk.lib.cas.cz/client/handle/uuid:8bd1c841-fa66-44c9-8049-c1a930c422f6
uuid:8bd1c841-fa66-44c9-8049-c1a930c422f6

Subject:

sociologie, teorie jednání, sociology, theory of action, Spojené státy americké, United States, 18, and 316

Type:

model:article and TEXT

Description:

The article confronts James Coleman’s and Randall Collins’s approaches towards action theory: reviews both their similarities (based on the importance of micro-sociological perspective for understanding social macro-level) and differences (their attitude towards the assumed rational nature of human action). Coleman supports the homo oeconomicus thesis and understands actors as beings, which make rational decisions and direct their actions on the basis of costs and gains calculations. Collins, on the other hand, emphasizes the extra-rational factors of emotions and routine. By putting up these approaches against each other two ideal type constructions arise, which are particular intellectual modes yet cannot comprehend social reality in its full complexity., Jiří Šubrt., and Obsahuje bibliografii

Language:

Czech

Rights:

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
policy:public

Coverage:

61-76

Source:

Teorie vědy | 2007 Volume:29 | Number:2

Harvested from:

CDK

Metadata only:

false