Jak oživit „zamrzlou” evoluční ontologii

Title:

Jak oživit „zamrzlou” evoluční ontologii
How to revive the "frozen" evolutionary ontology

Creator:

Radim Šíp

Identifier:

https://cdk.lib.cas.cz/client/handle/uuid:7a379e7b-092c-4a18-93ce-b56d37376067
uuid:7a379e7b-092c-4a18-93ce-b56d37376067

Subject:

Filozofie, ontologie (filozofie), evoluční ontologie, kultura, příroda, Prométheus (mytologická postava), ontology, evolutionary ontology, culture, nature, Prometheus (Greek deity), strong/weak anthropocentrism, epigenetic/structural information, Hegelo-Marxist/Kantian strategies, 5, and 101

Type:

article, diskuse, model:article, and TEXT

Format:

print

Description:

The discussion study takes as its starting point the thinking, which Professor Šmajs and others presented in Filosofický časopis 6, 2013 on evolutionary ontology. The author shows an enduring aspect of evolutionary ontology: ontology as the product of human culture attains to knowledge that has the seeming character of objective truth - it thus expresses the true nature of the ontic order of nature. This is not, however, the usual nonsense of inconsistent philosophy. The author of the text identifies as lying behind the step Kantian and Hegelian strategies which make possible this shift from the order of culture to the order of nature. These strategies are (i) a sign of the grounding of Professor Šmajs´ ideas in early-modern thinking; and (ii) they are the cause of a strongly anthropocentric attitude, which unwittingly influences the system of evolutionary ontology. At the end of the study, the author points to the fact that it would be more appropriate for evolutionary ontology if its proponents were able to give up their early-modern argumentative approach, and thus rid themselves of their strong anthropocentrism. In this way they would be able to avoid the conceptual conflict which makes evolutionary ontology "frozen" from within., Radim Šíp., and Obsahuje poznámky a bibliografii

Language:

Czech

Rights:

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
policy:public

Source:

Filosofický časopis | 2014 Volume:62 | Number:3

Harvested from:

CDK

Metadata only:

false