Anti-suit injunctions in arbitral and judicial procedures in the Czech Republic

Title:

Anti-suit injunctions in arbitral and judicial procedures in the Czech Republic

Creator:

Alexander J Bělohlávek

Identifier:

https://cdk.lib.cas.cz/client/handle/uuid:6e9ef313-31da-40d9-bd47-9456ff66e9b1
uuid:6e9ef313-31da-40d9-bd47-9456ff66e9b1
issn:1805-8396

Subject:

Česko., ordre public, rozhodčí smlouvy, ústavní právo, jurisdikce, překážka věci pravomocně rozhodnuté, arbitration agreements, constitutional law, jurisdiction, res judicata, anti-suit injunctions, anti-arbitration injunctions, recognition and enforcement of judgements, recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards, arbitration, Charter of Fundamental Rights, Kompetenz-Kompezenz, Lis Pendens, procedural conditions, objective arbitrability, 16, and 34

Type:

model:article and TEXT

Format:

print, bez média, and svazek

Description:

Anti-suit injunctions are rather unknown in the civil law legal system of the Czech Repbulic. The policy reasons for the rejection of anti-suit injunctions in the Czech Republic are rooted in the constitutional right of every person to assert, through the legally prescribed procedure, their rights before an independent and impartial court or, in specified cases, before another body. In other words, every person may commence proceedings before a competent court, or respectively before any court or another body (e.g. like an arbitral tribunal, etc.), which is then exclusively empowered to rule on its jurisdiction. Therefore, there is also no distinction between anti-suit injunctions in domestic and international litigation. Czech law does not have any alternative procedural or substantive devices that may have similar functions as anti-suit injunctions related to arbitration. It means that it is not possible to obtain a court order against a respondent prohibiting the respondent from commencing or continuing court proceedings in another forum in violation of an arbitration agreement., Alexander J. Bělohlávek., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy

Language:

English

Rights:

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
policy:public

Source:

The lawyer quarterly: international journal for legal research | 2018 Volume:8 | Number:4

Harvested from:

CDK

Metadata only:

false