The heterogeneity of water flow and solute transport was assessed during radioactive tracer infiltration experiment in a black clay loam soil using modified methods to estimate the effective cross section (ECS) and the degree of preferential flow (DPF). The results of field and numerical experiments showed that these parameters characterized the heterogeneity of water flow in the soils unequivocally. The ECS decreases non-linearly and the DPF increases linearly with an increase of the bypassing ratio (ratio of macropore flow rate to total flow rate). The ECS decreased and the DPF increased with depth, which suggests an increase in the heterogeneity of water flow with depth. The plot of the DPF against ECS values calculated from the tracer experiment data was consistent with the relationship obtained by the numerical simulation assuming preferential flow in the neighbourhood of three probes.
Soil water content and actual water repellency were assessed for soil profiles at two sites in a bare and grass-covered plot of a sand pasture, to investigate the impact of the grass removal on both properties. The soil of the plots was sampled six times in vertical transects to a depth of 33 cm between 23 May and 7 October 2002. On each sampling date the soil water contents were measured and the persistence of actual water repellency was determined of field-moist sam-ples. Considerably higher soil water contents were found in the bare versus the grass-covered plots. These alterations are caused by differences between evaporation and transpiration rates across the plots. Noteworthy are the often excessive differences in soil water content at depths of 10 to 30 cm between the bare and grass-covered plots. These differences are a consequence of water uptake by the roots in the grass-covered plots. The water storage in the upper 19 cm of the bare soil was at least two times greater than in the grass-covered soil during dry periods. A major part of the soil profile in the grass-covered plots exhibited extreme water repellency to a depth of 19 cm on all sampling dates, while the soil profile of the bare plots was completely wettable on eight of the twelve sampling dates. Significant differences in persistence of actual water repellency were found between the grass-covered and bare plots.
Soil water repellency causes at least temporal changes in the hydrological properties of a soil which result in, among other things, suboptimal growing conditions and increased irrigation requirements. Water repellency in soil is more widespread than previously thought and has been identified in many soil types under a wide array of climatic conditions worldwide. Consequences of soil water repellency include loss of wettability, increased runoff and preferential flow, reduced access to water for plants, reduced irrigation efficiency, increased requirement for water and other inputs, and increased potential for non-point source pollution. Research indicates that certain soil surfactants can be used to manage soil water repellency by modifying the flow dynamics of water and restoring soil wettability. This results in improved hydrological behavior of those soils. Consequently, the plant growth environment is also improved and significant water conservation is possible through more efficient functioning of the soil. and Vodoodpudivosť pôdy spôsobuje prinajmenšom dočasné zmeny v hydrologických vlastnostiach pôdy, ktoré okrem iného môžu viesť k suboptimálnym podmienkam rastu rastlín a k zvýšenej potrebe závlah. Vodoodpudivosť pôdy je rozšírenejší jav, ako sa pôvodne predpokladalo; bola identifikovaná v mnohých pôdnych typoch a klimatických podmienkach na celom svete. Dôsledkom vodoodpudivosti pôdy je strata zmáčavosti, zvýšený povrchový odtok a preferenčné prúdenie, znížená dostupnosť vody a iných vstupov pre rastliny, znížený účinok závlah, zvýšené požiadavky na vodu a iné vstupy, ako aj zvýšené riziko plošného znečistenia. Výskum naznačuje, že niektoré povrchovo aktívne látky (soil surfactants) môžu upraviť vodoodpudivosť pôdy obnovením omáčania a modifikáciou dynamiky vody. Výsledkom je zlepšenie hydrologických vlastností pôdy. Podobne, výsledkom je zlepšenie prostredia pre rast rastlín, zvýšenie retencie vody v pôde a teda aj efektívnejšia funkcia pôdy.