Dependency Tree

Universal Dependencies - English - ParTUT

LanguageEnglish
ProjectParTUT
Corpus Parttrain

Select a sentence

Showing 501 - 600 of 1781 • previousnext

s-501 Allowing subscribers is a simple way to broaden your conversation on Facebook, while reserving personal updates for people you know well.
s-502 Common questions.
s-503 You've always been subscribed to your friends.
s-504 Why don't all profiles have a 'Subscribe' button?
s-505 Only people who allow subscribers will have a 'Subscribe' button on their profile.
s-506 How do people subscribe to my updates?
s-507 After you allow subscribers, a 'Subscribe' button will show up on your Profile.
s-508 Your public updates will appear in people's News Feeds once they click this button.
s-509 If I allow subscribers, what updates will they see?
s-510 Subscribers can see only the things you share publicly.
s-511 They can also choose how many and what types of these public updates they get.
s-512 Learn more about the 'Subscribe' button in the Help Centre.
s-513 Learn about the differences between allowing subscribers and using a Page.
s-514 Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
s-515 The harmonisation of national laws is the only means to prevent such barriers to trade and unfair competition.
s-516 (2) Energy-using products (EUPs) account for a large proportion of the consumption of natural resources and energy in the Community.
s-517 They also have a number of other important environmental impacts.
s-518 For the vast majority of product categories available on the Community market, very different degrees of environmental impact can be noted though they provide similar functional performances.
s-519 In the interest of sustainable development, continuous improvement in the overall environmental impact of those products should be encouraged, notably by identifying the major sources of negative environmental impacts and avoiding transfer of pollution, when this improvement does not entail excessive costs.
s-520 (3) The ecodesign of products is a crucial factor in the Community strategy on Integrated Product Policy.
s-521 As a preventive approach, designed to optimise the environmental performance of products, while maintaining their functional qualities, it provides genuine new opportunities for manufacturers, for consumers and for society as a whole.
s-522 (4) Energy efficiency improvement - with one of the available options being more efficient end use of electricity - is regarded as contributing substantially to the achievement of greenhouse gas emission targets in the Community.
s-523 A significant reduction in energy consumption as suggested by the Commission in its European Climate Change Programme (ECCP) is possible.
s-524 Climate change is one of the priorities of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, laid down by Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
s-525 Energy saving is the most cost-effective way to increase security of supply and reduce import dependency.
s-526 Therefore, substantial demand side measures and targets should be adopted.
s-527 (5) Action should be taken during the design phase of EUPs, since it appears that the pollution caused during a product's life cycle is determined at that stage, and most of the costs involved are committed then.
s-528 (6) A coherent framework for the application of Community Ecodesign requirements for EUPs should be established with the aim of ensuring the free movement of those products which comply and of improving their overall environmental impact.
s-529 Such Community requirements should respect the principles of fair competition and international trade.
s-530 (7) Ecodesign requirements should be set bearing in mind the goals and priorities of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, including as appropriate applicable goals of the relevant thematic strategies of that Programme.
s-531 (8) This Directive seeks to achieve a high level of protection for the environment by reducing the potential environmental impact of EUPs, which will ultimately be beneficial to consumers and other end-users.
s-532 Sustainable development also requires proper consideration of the health, social and economic impact of the measures envisaged.
s-533 Improving the energy efficiency of products contributes to the security of the energy supply, which is a precondition of sound economic activity and therefore of sustainable development.
s-534 (9) A Member State deeming it necessary to maintain national provisions on grounds of major needs relating to the protection of the environment, or to introduce new ones based on new scientific evidence relating to the protection of the environment on groundsof a problem specific to that member state arising after the adoption of the applicable implementing measure, may do so following the conditions laid down in article 95 (4), (5) and (6) of the treaty, that provides for a prior notification to and approval from the Commission.
s-535 (10) In order to maximise the environmental benefits from improved design it may be necessary to inform consumers about the environmental characteristics and performance of EUPs and to advise them about how to use products in a manner which is environmentally friendly.
s-536 (11) The approach set out in the Green Paper on Integrated Product Policy, which is a major innovative element of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, aims to reduce the environmental impacts of products across the whole of their life cycle.
s-537 Considering at the design stage a product's environmental impact throughout its whole life cycle has a high potential to facilitate environmental improvement in a cost-effective way.
s-538 There should be sufficient flexibility to enable this factor to be integrated in product design whilst taking account of technical, functional and economic considerations.
s-539 (12) Although a comprehensive approach to environmental performance is desirable, greenhouse gas mitigation through increased energy efficiency should be considered a priority environmental goal pending the adoption of a working plan.
s-540 (13) It may be necessary and justified to establish specific quantified ecodesign requirements for some products or environmental aspects thereof in order to ensure that their environmental impact is minimised.
s-541 Given the urgent need to contribute to the achievement of the commitments in the framework of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and without prejudice to the integrated approach promoted in this Directive, some priority should be given to those measures with a high potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions at low cost.
s-542 Such measures can also contribute to a sustainable use of resources and constitute a major contribution to the 10-year framework of programmes on sustainable production and consumption agreed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in September 2002.
s-543 (15) While the best-performing products or technologies available on the market, including on international markets, should be taken as reference, the level of ecodesign requirements should be established on the basis of technical, economic and environmental analysis.
s-544 Flexibility in the method for establishing the level of requirements can make swift improvement of environmental performance easier.
s-545 Interested parties involved should be consulted and cooperate actively in this analysis.
s-546 The setting of mandatory measures requires proper consultation of the parties involved.
s-547 Such consultation may highlight the need for a phased introduction or transitional measures.
s-548 The introduction of interim targets increases the predictability of the policy, allows for accommodating product development cycles and facilitates long term planning for interested parties.
s-549 (16) Priority should be given to alternative courses of action such as self-regulation by the industry where such action is likely to deliver the policy objectives faster or in a less costly manner than mandatory requirements.
s-550 Legislative measures may be needed where market forces fail to evolve in the right direction or at an acceptable speed.
s-551 (18) For the assessment of voluntary agreements or other self-regulation measures presented as alternatives to implementing measures, information on at least the following issues should be available:
s-552 openness of participation, added value, representativeness, quantified and staged objectives, involvement of civil society, monitoring and reporting, cost-effectiveness of administering a self-regulatory initiative, sustainability.
s-553 19) Chapter 6 of the Commission's 'Communication on Environmental Agreements at Community level within the Framework of the Action Plan on the Simplification and Improvement of the Regulatory Environment' could provide useful guidance when assessing self-regulation by industry in the context of this Directive.
s-554 (20) This Directive should also encourage the integration of Ecodesign in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and very small firms.
s-555 Such integration could be facilitated by wide availability of and easy access to information relating to the sustainability of their products.
s-556 The rigorous enforcement of implementing measures is necessary to reduce the environmental impact of regulated EUPs and to ensure fair competition.
s-557 (22) When preparing implementing measures and its working plan the Commission should consult Member States' representatives as well as interested parties concerned with the product group, such as industry, including SMEs and craft industry, trade unions, traders, retailers, importers, environmental protection groups and consumer organisations.
s-558 (23) When preparing implementing measures, the Commission should also take due account of existing national environmental legislation, in particular concerning toxic substances, which Member States have indicated that they consider should be preserved, without reducing the existing and justified levels of protection in the Member States.
s-559 (24) Regard should be given to the modules and rules intended for use in technical harmonisation Directives set out in Council Decision 93/465/EEC of 22 July 1993 concerning the modules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures and the rules for the affixing and use of the CE conformity marking, which are intended to be used in the technical harmonisation Directives.
s-560 (25) Surveillance authorities should exchange information on the measures envisaged within the scope of this Directive with a view to improving surveillance of the market.
s-561 Such cooperation should make the utmost use of electronic means of communication and relevant Community programmes.
s-562 ll The exchange of information on environmental life cycle performance and on the achievements of design solutions should be facilitated.
s-563 The accumulation and dissemination of the body of knowledge generated by the ecodesign efforts of manufacturers is one of the crucial benefits of this Directive.
s-564 (26) A competent body is usually a public or private body, designated by the public authorities, and presenting the necessary guarantees for impartiality and availability of technical expertise for carrying out verification of the product with regard to its compliance with the applicable implementing measures.
s-565 (27) Noting the importance of avoiding non-compliance, Member States should ensure that the necessary means are available for effective market surveillance.
s-566 (28) In respect of training and information on ecodesign for SMEs, it may be appropriate to consider accompanying activities.
s-567 (29) It is in the interest of the functioning of the internal market to have standards which have been harmonised at Community level.
s-568 Once the reference to such a standard has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, compliance with it should raise a presumption of conformity with the corresponding requirements set out in the implementing measure adopted on the basis of this Directive, although other means of demonstrating such conformity should be permitted.
s-569 (30) One of the main roles of harmonised standards should be to help manufacturers in applying the implementing measures adopted under this Directive.
s-570 Such standards could be essential in establishing measuring and testing methods.
s-571 In the case of generic ecodesign requirements harmonised standards could contribute considerably to guiding manufacturers in establishing the ecological profile of their products in accordance with the requirements of the applicable implementing measure.
s-572 These standards should clearly indicate the relationship between their clauses and the requirements dealt with.
s-573 The purpose of harmonised standards should not be to fix limits for environmental aspects.
s-574 (31) For the purpose of definitions used in this Directive it is useful to refer to relevant international standards such as ISO 14040 (32).
s-575 This Directive is in accordance with certain principles for the implementation of the new approach as set out in the Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical harmonisation and standards and of making reference to harmonised European standards.
s-576 The Council Resolution of 28 October 1999 on the role of standardisation in Europe recommended that the Commission should examine whether the New Approach principle could be extended to sectors not yet covered as a means of improving and simplifying legislation wherever possible.
s-577 (33) This Directive is complementary to existing Community instruments such as Council Directive 92/75/EEC of 22 September 1992 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by household appliances, Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme, Regulation (EC) No 2422/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on a Community energy efficiency labelling programme for office equipment, Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment and Council Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations.
s-578 Synergies between this Directive and the existing Community instruments should contribute to increasing their respective impacts and building coherent requirements for manufacturers to apply.
s-579 (34) Since Council Directive 92/42/EEC of 21 May 1992 on efficiency requirements for new hot-water boilers fired with liquid or gaseous fuels, Directive 96/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 September 1996 on energy efficiency requirements for household electric refrigerators, freezers and combinations thereof and Directive 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on energy efficiency requirements for ballasts for fluorescent lighting already contain provisions for the revision of the energy efficiency requirements, they should be integrated into the present framework.
s-580 (35) Directive 92/42/EEC provides for a star rating system intended to ascertain the energy performance of boilers.
s-581 Since Member States and the industry agree that the star rating system has proved not to deliver the expected result, Directive 92/42/EEC should be amended to open the way for more effective schemes.
s-582 (36) The requirements laid down in Council Directive 78/170/EEC of 13 February 1978 on the performance of heat generators for space heating and the production of hot water in new or existing non-industrial buildings and on the insulation of heat and domestic hot-water distribution in new non-industrial buildings have been superseded by provisions of Directive 92/42/EEC, Council Directive 90/396/EEC of 29 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to appliances burning gaseous fuels and Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings.
s-583 Directive 78/170/EEC should therefore be repealed.
s-584 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND TO THE COUNCIL concerning the implementation and continuation of the Pericles programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting.
s-585 Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending and extending Council Decision of 17 December 2001 establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the 'Pericles' programme).
s-586 Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION extending to the non-participating Member States the application of Council Decision amending and extending Council Decision of 17 December 2001 establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the 'Pericles' programme).
s-587 Pericles, the Community programme for exchange, assistance and training in the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, was established by Council Decision of 17 December 2001 (2001/923/EC) and is designed to support and supplement the measures undertaken by the Member States and in existing programmes to protect the euro against counterfeiting.
s-588 Such measures include information exchange (seminars, workshops, meetings and conferences), placements and exchanges of staff, as well as technical, scientific and operational back-up.
s-589 Article 1 of the Pericles Decision provides that the programme shall run from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2005.
s-590 Article 6 of the Decision set a reference amount of 4 million euro for the programme.
s-591 Article 13 (3) of the Pericles Decision provides that the Commission shall send to the European Parliament and the Council, by 30 June 2005:
s-592 - a report, independent from the programme manager, evaluating the relevance, the efficiency and the effectiveness of the programme;
s-593 - a communication on whether this programme should be continued and adapted, accompanied by an appropriate proposal.
s-594 The evaluation report of the Pericles Programme was submitted on 30 November 2004.
s-595 Since early Summer 2003, the number of counterfeit euro banknotes detected in circulation has stabilised at about 50000 a month, a level below the pre-euro levels, lower than the US dollar and extremely low compared to the nine billion genuine euro banknotes in circulation.
s-596 At the same time, the number of counterfeit euro coins is continuing to increase but also remains low by historical standards.
s-597 In addition, the police forces have successfully conducted a number of operations to dismantle workshops and seize large numbers of counterfeit banknotes and coins before they enter into circulation.
s-598 This overall favourable situation is the result of a long preparation at both legislative and institutional level and demonstrates the high level of cooperation achieved in EU and at international level.
s-599 The Commission set out the basic ideas for the protection of the euro in a Communication it published as early as 1998 [1].
s-600 And, in 1999 Europol’s mandate was extended to include money counterfeiting [4].

Text viewDownload CoNNL-U