This is a new version of the repository. Do let us know (lindat-help at ufal.mff.cuni.cz) if you encounter any issues.
 

Dataset used in the paper Uncovering Relationships using Bayesian Networks: A Case Study on Conspiracy Theories

Please use the following text to cite this item or export to a predefined format:
Vomlel, Jiří; Kuběna, Aleš; Šmíd, Martin and Weinerová, Josefína, 2024, Dataset used in the paper Uncovering Relationships using Bayesian Networks: A Case Study on Conspiracy Theories, LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ digital library at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics (ÚFAL), http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12800/1-5679.
Date issued
2024-09-11
Size
78 kB
Language(s)
Description
Dataset from a Czech university entrance exam. This dataset includes a test of active, open-minded thinking designed by Jonathan Baron, as well as a test of students’ attitudes toward various conspiracies. Data were analyzed in the paper J. Vomlel, A. Kuběna, M. Šmíd, J. Weinerová. Uncovering Relationships using Bayesian Networks: A Case Study on Conspiracy Theories, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Volume 246 : International Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models, p. 470-485, International Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models 2024 /12./, (Nijmegen, NL, 20240911) https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v246/main/assets/vomlel24a/vomlel24a.pdf
This item isPublicly Available
and licensed under:
 Files in this item
Name
variables_baron_conspiracy.txt
Size
5.84 KB
Format
text/plain
Description
Text
MD5
558c9dc878cc0c826e4cc34ab51a03c7
Preview
  File Preview
    Baron variables
    We use (R) to indicate reverse scoring.
    
    (B1) Allowing oneself to be convinced by a solid opposing argument is a sign of good character.
    (B2) People should take into consideration evidence that goes against conclusions they favor.
    (B3) Being undecided or unsure is the result of muddled thinking. (R)
    (B4) People should revise their conclusions in response to relevant new information.
    (B5) Changing your mind is a sign of weakness. (R)
    (B6) People should search actively for reasons why they might be wrong.
    (B7) It is OK to ignore evidence against your established beliefs. (R)
    (B8) It is important to be loyal to your beliefs even when evidence is brought to bear against them. (R)
    (B9) When we are faced with a new question, the first answer that occurs to us is usually best. (R)
    (B10) Good thinking leads to uncertainty when there are good arguments on both sides.
    (B11) When faced with a new question, we should consider more than one possible answer before reaching a conclusion.
    
    Conspiracy Theories
    The following is our translation of the original Czech text (see below). We have classified the conspiracies into groups. You can see that some of the statements are not conspiracies, but rather lack of knowledge, etc. For the sake of simplicity, we will refer to all these statements as conspiracies. Again, we use (R) to indicate reverse evaluation.
    
    “Hard core” Conspiracies
    (C15) The trail behind the jets is made up of chemicals released to affect human health or natural processes.
    (C14) Humans never actually landed on the moon, it was all recorded in TV studios. 
    
    Shallow Knowledge
    (C5) We are warmer in summer than in winter because the distance from the Earth to the Sun is smaller in the summer than in the winter.
    (C7) At very high temperatures, iron can evaporate. (R)
    (C10) An astronaut in a spacecraft is not affected by gravity because it’s far from Earth.
    (C9) 100 million is the same as one billion.
    
    Ignorance of New Facts (Covid-19)
    (C11) Vaccinati . . .
Name
scio_baron_conspiracy_complete_cases.csv
Size
75.93 KB
Format
application/octet-stream
Description
Unknown
MD5
4aa7efee404675b98f9e8e892e2bb1c4
Preview
  File Preview